Literature DB >> 24800152

Linking Medicare, Medicaid, and cancer registry data to study the burden of cancers in West Virginia.

Pramit A Nadpara1, Suresh S Madhavan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Develop the WVCR-Linked dataset by combining the West Virginia Cancer Registry (WVCR) with Medicare, Medicaid, and other data sources. Determine health care utilization, costs, and overall burden of four major cancers among the elderly in a rural and medically underserved state population, and to compare them with national estimates.
METHOD: We extracted personal identifiers from the West Virginia Cancer Registry (WVCR) data file for individuals ≥ 65 years of age with an incident diagnosis of any cancer between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2007. We linked the extracted data with Medicare and Medicaid administrative data using deterministic record linkage procedures. We updated missing vital status information by linking the National Death Index (NDI) data file. The updated WVCR-Linked dataset was enriched by links to the U.S. decennial census (2000) file and the Area Resource File.
RESULTS: We identified 42,333 individuals, of which 41,574 (98.2%) and 6,031 (14.3%) individuals were matched with Medicare and Medicaid administrative data files, respectively. The NDI data added or updated vital status information for 3,295 (7.8%) individuals in the WVCR-Linked dataset.
CONCLUSION: The WVCR-Linked dataset is a comprehensive dataset offering many opportunities to understand factors related to cancer treatment patterns, costs, and outcomes in a rural and medically underserved elderly Appalachian population. Following our example, non-participant states in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program can build a powerful dataset to identify and target cancer disparities, and to improve cancer-related outcomes for their elderly and dual-eligible citizens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appalachian; Cancer; Data Linkage; Medicaid; Medicare

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24800152      PMCID: PMC4006474          DOI: 10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev        ISSN: 2159-0354


  45 in total

1.  An empirical comparison of record linkage procedures.

Authors:  Shanti Gomatam; Randy Carter; Mario Ariet; Glenn Mitchell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Ability of Medicaid claims data to identify incident cases of breast cancer in the Ohio Medicaid population.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian; Gregory S Cooper; Alfred A Rimm
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Using administrative diagnostic data to assess the quality of hospital care. Pitfalls and potential of ICD-9-CM.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Communities and health policy: a pathway for change.

Authors:  Judith Bell; Marion Standish
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  State-specific prevalence and trends in adult cigarette smoking--United States, 1998-2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 6.  A glance at Appalachia.

Authors:  C Newell-Withrow
Journal:  J Cult Divers       Date:  1997

7.  Comparison of adverse events during 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Hanna K Sanoff; William R Carpenter; Janet Freburger; Ling Li; Kun Chen; Leah L Zullig; Richard M Goldberg; Maria J Schymura; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  California Medicaid enrollment and melanoma stage at diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ricardo A Pollitt; Christina A Clarke; Sarah J Shema; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Socioeconomic and demographic disparities in treatment for carcinomas of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  Juliet VanEenwyk; Joseph S Campo; Eric M Ossiander
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Linking tumor registry and Medicaid claims to evaluate cancer care delivery.

Authors:  Deborah Schrag; Beth A Virnig; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2009
View more
  9 in total

1.  Treatment and Survival of Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between a Rural State Cancer Registry and National Data.

Authors:  Pallavi B Rane; S Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi; Kalidindi Sita; Sobha Kurian; Xiaoyun Pan
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Tobacco-use Cessation Counseling Service Usage.

Authors:  Pramit A Nadpara; S Suresh Madhavan; Cindy Tworek
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

3.  Differences in Medicare Expenditures Between Appalachian and Nationally Representative Cohorts of Elderly Women With Breast Cancer: An Application of Decomposition Technique.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; S Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  A pilot study for long-term outcome assessment after aortic aneurysm repair using Vascular Quality Initiative data matched to Medicare claims.

Authors:  Andrew W Hoel; Adrienne E Faerber; Kayla O Moore; Niveditta Ramkumar; Benjamin S Brooke; Salvatore T Scali; Art Sedrakyan; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Disparities in Lung Cancer Care and Outcomes among Elderly in a Medically Underserved State Population-A Cancer Registry-Linked Database Study.

Authors:  Pramit A Nadpara; S Suresh Madhavan; Cindy Tworek
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Racial differences in receipt of adjuvant hormonal therapy among Medicaid enrollees in South Carolina diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tisha M Felder; D Phuong Do; Z Kevin Lu; Lincy S Lal; Sue P Heiney; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Development and Evaluation of a Process to Link Cancer Patients in the SEER Registries to National Medicaid Enrollment Data.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Suzie Benner; Jennifer Stevens; Lindsey Enewold; Bin Huang; Lirong Zhao; Negussie Tilahun; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-05-01

8.  Comparison of the Initial Loco-Regional Treatment Received for Early-Stage Breast Cancer between Elderly Women in Appalachia and a United States - Based Population: Good and Bad News.

Authors:  Traci LeMasters; S Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Global J Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016

Review 9.  Unlocking the potential of population-based cancer registries.

Authors:  Thomas C Tucker; Eric B Durbin; Jaclyn K McDowell; Bin Huang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 6.860

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.