Literature DB >> 9806651

A comparison of patterns of care of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma patients in a younger and Medigap commercially insured cohort.

B E Hillner1, M K McDonald, C E Desch, T J Smith, L T Penberthy, S M Retchin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine and compare lifetime treatment patterns and hospitalization of incident nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) between pre-Medicare eligible (age < 65 years) and supplemental Medigap (age > or = 65 years) enrollees in a commercially insured cohort using insurance claims.
METHODS: Claims from Virginia Blue Cross and Blue Shield beneficiaries with NSCLC submitted between 1989-1991 were merged with records from the Virginia Cancer Registry (VCR). Data from the VCR identified incident cases, disease stage, and type of tumor. Initial treatment categories were stratified using Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology codes.
RESULTS: There were 1706 incident NSCLC patients; 349 were age < or = 64 years ("younger") and 1212 were age > or = 65 years ("elderly"). Having commercial insurance was not associated with any survival advantage compared with national averages at 2 years. In comparison with elderly patients, younger patients more often were treated with surgery for local disease (80.2% vs. 54.8%) and surgery alone or in combination with radiation for regional disease (51.9% vs. 32.0%). Radiation was used more often in elderly patients compared with younger patients with local disease (30.5% vs. 14.0%) but less often in patients with distant disease (76.2% vs. 54.9%). Compared with elderly patients, younger patients presenting with distant disease received more chemotherapy (18.8% vs. 5.1%; P <0.001); late palliative use of chemotherapy or radiation occurred in only 4-8% of younger patients. Compared with elderly patients, younger patients with regional or distant disease spent more days in the hospital (compared with national averages at 2 years: regional disease, 30.0 vs. 23.9 days; distant disease, 33.0 vs. 21.4 days; P <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that more comprehensive health insurance is not associated with better outcomes in patients with NSCLC. Age specific trends for greater use of surgery, radiation, and total hospitalization in younger patients is consistent with other reports. Commercial health care claims supplemented by clinical staging from cancer registries can address long term practice patterns in patients with cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9806651     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981101)83:9<1930::aid-cncr8>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

1.  Disparities in oncologic surgery.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Jane C Weeks; Steven C Stain
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Treatment Toxicity in Elderly Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Minal S Kale; Grace Mhango; Jorge E Gomez; Keith Sigel; Cardinale B Smith; Marcelo Bonomi; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Improved outcomes associated with higher surgery rates for older patients with early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Mary Beth Landrum; Elizabeth B Lamont; Barbara J McNeil; Michael T Jaklitsch; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  State-level cancer quality assessment and research: building and sustaining the data infrastructure.

Authors:  Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Efficacy of functional operability algorithm for octogenarians with primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Hideo Umezu; Shinichiro Miyoshi; Osamu Araki; Yohko Karube; Motohiko Tamura; Satoru Kobayashi; Hiromi Ishihama; Masayuki Chida
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-01-13

6.  Using claims-based measures to predict performance status score in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Thomas J Smith; Gail A Jensen; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Guideline-concordant lung cancer care and associated health outcomes among elderly patients in the United States.

Authors:  Pramit A Nadpara; S Suresh Madhavan; Cindy Tworek; Usha Sambamoorthi; Michael Hendryx; Mohammed Almubarak
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Understanding cancer patients' experience and outcomes: development and pilot study of the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance patient survey.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin; Clifford Ko; John Z Ayanian; David Harrington; David R Nerenz; Katherine L Kahn; Julie Ganther-Urmie; Paul J Catalano; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert B Wallace; Edward Guadagnoli; Neeraj K Arora; Maryse D Roudier; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Complexity of care needs and unstaged cancer in elders: a population-based study.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian; Fang Xu; Heather Beaird; Mireya Diaz; Patrick Murray; Julia H Rose
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2007-07-19

10.  Real-world effectiveness of systemic agents approved for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis.

Authors:  Taofeek K Owonikoko; Camille Ragin; Zhengjia Chen; Sungjin Kim; Madhusmita Behera; Johann C Brandes; Nabil F Saba; Rebecca Pentz; Suresh S Ramalingam; Fadlo R Khuri
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.