Literature DB >> 21795559

High efficiency in human muscle: an anomaly and an opportunity?

Frank E Nelson1, Justus D Ortega, Sharon A Jubrias, Kevin E Conley, Martin J Kushmerick.   

Abstract

Can human muscle be highly efficient in vivo? Animal muscles typically show contraction-coupling efficiencies <50% in vitro but a recent study reports that the human first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the hand has an efficiency value in vivo of 68%. We examine two key factors that could account for this apparently high efficiency value: (1) transfer of cross-bridge work into mechanical work and (2) the use of elastic energy to do external work. Our analysis supports a high contractile efficiency reflective of nearly complete transfer of muscular to mechanical work with no contribution by recycling of elastic energy to mechanical work. Our survey of reported contraction-coupling efficiency values puts the FDI value higher than typical values found in small animals in vitro but within the range of values for human muscle in vivo. These high efficiency values support recent studies that suggest lower Ca(2+) cycling costs in working contractions and a decline in cost during repeated contractions. In the end, our analysis indicates that the FDI muscle may be exceptional in having an efficiency value on the higher end of that reported for human muscle. Thus, the FDI muscle may be an exception both in contraction-coupling efficiency and in Ca(2+) cycling costs, which makes it an ideal muscle model system offering prime conditions for studying the energetics of muscle contraction in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21795559      PMCID: PMC3144848          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.052985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  36 in total

1.  Explaining differences in the metabolic cost and efficiency of treadmill locomotion in children.

Authors:  Gail Frost; Oded Bar-Or; James Dowling; Kerry Dyson
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 2.  The efficiency of muscle contraction.

Authors:  Nicholas P Smith; Christopher J Barclay; Denis S Loiselle
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 3.  Concepts and models of functional architecture in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  E Otten
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.230

4.  The energetics of tortoise muscle.

Authors:  R C Woledge
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  The August Krogh Principle: "For many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied".

Authors:  H A Krebs
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1975-10

6.  Direct and indirect calorimetry of lactate oxidation: implications for whole-body energy expenditure.

Authors:  Christopher B Scott; Richard B Kemp
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 7.  Energetics and biomechanics of locomotion by red kangaroos (Macropus rufus).

Authors:  R Kram; T J Dawson
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Mitochondrial function in vivo: spectroscopy provides window on cellular energetics.

Authors:  Catherine E Amara; David J Marcinek; Eric G Shankland; Kenneth A Schenkman; Lorilee S L Arakaki; Kevin E Conley
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Efficiency of fast- and slow-twitch muscles of the mouse performing cyclic contractions.

Authors:  C J Barclay
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Heat production and oxygen consumption during metabolic recovery of white muscle fibres from the dogfish Scyliorhinus canicula.

Authors:  F Lou; W J van Der Laarse; N A Curtin; R C Woledge
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  3 in total

1.  Limit to steady-state aerobic power of skeletal muscles.

Authors:  A Paglietti
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 1.365

2.  Attempting to better define "intensity" for muscular performance: is it all wasted effort?

Authors:  J Fisher; D Smith
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  What limits performance during whole-body incremental exercise to exhaustion in humans?

Authors:  David Morales-Alamo; José Losa-Reyna; Rafael Torres-Peralta; Marcos Martin-Rincon; Mario Perez-Valera; David Curtelin; Jesús Gustavo Ponce-González; Alfredo Santana; José A L Calbet
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.182

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.