Literature DB >> 15561300

The efficiency of muscle contraction.

Nicholas P Smith1, Christopher J Barclay, Denis S Loiselle.   

Abstract

When a muscle contracts and shortens against a load, it performs work. The performance of work is fuelled by the expenditure of metabolic energy, more properly quantified as enthalpy (i.e., heat plus work). The ratio of work performed to enthalpy produced provides one measure of efficiency. However, if the primary interest is in the efficiency of the actomyosin cross-bridges, then the metabolic overheads associated with basal metabolism and excitation-contraction coupling, together with those of subsequent metabolic recovery process, must be subtracted from the total heat and work observed. By comparing the cross-bridge work component of the remainder to the Gibbs free energy of hydrolysis of ATP, a measure of thermodynamic efficiency is achieved. We describe and quantify this partitioning process, providing estimates of the efficiencies of selected steps, while discussing the errors that can arise in the process of quantification. The dependence of efficiency on animal species, fibre-type, temperature, and contractile velocity is considered. The effect of contractile velocity on energetics is further examined using a two-state, Huxley-style, mathematical model of cross-bridge cycling that incorporates filament compliance. Simulations suggest only a modest effect of filament compliance on peak efficiency, but progressively larger gains (vis-à-vis the rigid filament case) as contractile velocity approaches Vmax. This effect is attributed primarily to a reduction in the component of energy loss arising from detachment of cross-bridge heads at non-zero strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15561300     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2003.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  45 in total

1.  Slow skeletal muscles of the mouse have greater initial efficiency than fast muscles but the same net efficiency.

Authors:  C J Barclay; C L Weber
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Force and power generating mechanism(s) in active muscle as revealed from temperature perturbation studies.

Authors:  K W Ranatunga
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Nucleotide pocket thermodynamics measured by EPR reveal how energy partitioning relates myosin speed to efficiency.

Authors:  Thomas J Purcell; Nariman Naber; Kathy Franks-Skiba; Alexander R Dunn; Catherine C Eldred; Christopher L Berger; András Málnási-Csizmadia; James A Spudich; Douglas M Swank; Edward Pate; Roger Cooke
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Contraction coupling efficiency of human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Authors:  Sharon A Jubrias; Nina K Vollestad; Rod K Gronka; Martin J Kushmerick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Mechanical efficiency of limb swing during walking and running in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris).

Authors:  Jonas Rubenson; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-02-19

Review 6.  Temperature change as a probe of muscle crossbridge kinetics: a review and discussion.

Authors:  R C Woledge; C J Barclay; N A Curtin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Actomyosin purse strings: renewable resources that make morphogenesis robust and resilient.

Authors:  Alice Rodriguez-Diaz; Yusuke Toyama; Daniel L Abravanel; John M Wiemann; Adrienne R Wells; U Serdar Tulu; Glenn S Edwards; Daniel P Kiehart
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2008-07-23

8.  A cross-bridge cycle with two tension-generating steps simulates skeletal muscle mechanics.

Authors:  Gerald Offer; K W Ranatunga
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  High efficiency in human muscle: an anomaly and an opportunity?

Authors:  Frank E Nelson; Justus D Ortega; Sharon A Jubrias; Kevin E Conley; Martin J Kushmerick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Forward dynamics simulations provide insight into muscle mechanical work during human locomotion.

Authors:  Richard R Neptune; Craig P McGowan; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.