Literature DB >> 7964400

Efficiency of fast- and slow-twitch muscles of the mouse performing cyclic contractions.

C J Barclay1.   

Abstract

The mechanical efficiency of mouse fast- and slow-twitch muscle was determined during contractions involving sinusoidal length changes. Measurements were made of muscle length, force production and initial heat output from bundles of muscle fibres in vitro at 31 degrees C. Power output was calculated as the product of the net work output per sinusoidal length cycle and the cycle frequency. The initial mechanical efficiency was defined as power output/(rate of initial heat production+power output). Both power output and rate of initial heat production were averaged over a full cycle of length change. The amplitude of length changes was +/- 5% of muscle length. Stimulus phase and duration were adjusted to maximise net work output at each cycle frequency used. The maximum initial mechanical efficiency of slow-twitch soleus muscle was 0.52 +/- 0.01 (mean +/- 1 S.E.M. N = 4) and occurred at a cycle frequency of 3 Hz. Efficiency was not significantly different from this at cycle frequencies of 1.5-4 Hz, but was significantly lower at cycle frequencies of 0.5 and 1 Hz. The maximum efficiency of fast-twitch extensor digitorum longus muscle was 0.34 +/- 0.03 (N = 4) and was relatively constant (0.32-0.34) over a broad range of frequencies (4-12 Hz). A comparison of these results with those from previous studies of the mechanical efficiency of mammalian muscles indicates that efficiency depends markedly on contraction protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7964400     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.193.1.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  13 in total

1.  Slow skeletal muscles of the mouse have greater initial efficiency than fast muscles but the same net efficiency.

Authors:  C J Barclay; C L Weber
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  The science of cycling: factors affecting performance - part 2.

Authors:  Erik W Faria; Daryl L Parker; Irvin E Faria
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Muscle directly meets the vast power demands in agile lizards.

Authors:  Nancy A Curtin; Roger C Woledge; Peter Aerts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Effect of internal power on muscular efficiency during cycling exercise.

Authors:  Masato Tokui; Kohji Hirakoba
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Efficiency and cross-bridge work output of skeletal muscle is decreased at low levels of activation.

Authors:  D B Lewis; C J Barclay
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 6.  High efficiency in human muscle: an anomaly and an opportunity?

Authors:  Frank E Nelson; Justus D Ortega; Sharon A Jubrias; Kevin E Conley; Martin J Kushmerick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Effects of load and training modes on physiological and metabolic responses in resistance exercise.

Authors:  S Buitrago; N Wirtz; Z Yue; H Kleinöder; J Mester
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Muscle oxygen uptake and energy turnover during dynamic exercise at different contraction frequencies in humans.

Authors:  R A Ferguson; D Ball; P Krustrup; P Aagaard; M Kjaer; A J Sargeant; Y Hellsten; J Bangsbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The slow component of O(2) uptake is not accompanied by changes in muscle EMG during repeated bouts of heavy exercise in humans.

Authors:  B W Scheuermann; B D Hoelting; M L Noble; T J Barstow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  A PHYSIOLOGIST'S PERSPECTIVE ON ROBOTIC EXOSKELETONS FOR HUMAN LOCOMOTION.

Authors:  Daniel P Ferris; Gregory S Sawicki; Monica A Daley
Journal:  Int J HR       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.