Literature DB >> 15841591

Direct and indirect calorimetry of lactate oxidation: implications for whole-body energy expenditure.

Christopher B Scott1, Richard B Kemp.   

Abstract

Whole-body energy expenditure for heavy/severe exercise is currently accounted for by either: (1) anaerobic and oxygen uptake measures during exercise where recovery energy expenditure is omitted; or (2) oxygen uptake during, and an EPOC (excess post-exercise oxygen consumption), measure following exercise where substrate level phosphorylation during exercise is considered part of EPOC. Simultaneous direct/indirect calorimetry enabled us to determine if a thermodynamic reversal (i.e. heat consumption) takes place as the highly exothermic pyruvate to lactate reaction proceeds in the opposite direction. Reversibility implies that oxygen uptake (e.g. EPOC) can indeed account for rapid glycolytic ATP production regardless if lactate is formed or not (e.g. 1.2 g glucose catabolism = 20.9 kJ x l O2(-1)). Cultured hybrid cells and mouse cardiac muscle fibres were utilized in simultaneous calorimetry and respirometry experiments where pyruvate or lactate was predominantly oxidized. The calorimetric to respiratory ratio was determined using heat flux (pW x cell(-1)) and oxygen flux (pmol x s(-1) cell(-1)) measures. Ten cell experiments gave calorimetric to respiratory ratios that showed no statistical difference (P= 0.97) whether cells respired predominantly on lactate (-516+/-53 kJ x mol O2(-1)) or pyruvate (- 517+/-89 kJ x mol O2(-1)). In three cardiac preparations, the calorimetric to respiratory ratio was -502+/-15 kJ x mol O2(-1) for lactate and -506+/-47 kJ x mol O2(-1) for pyruvate, again a non-significant difference (P= 0.91). Heat consumption did not occur during lactate oxidation. These results suggest that rapid glycolytic ATP and lactate production, and lactate oxidation, are both independently associated with heat production and thus represent separate and additive components to the measurement of total energy expenditure for exercise and recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15841591     DOI: 10.1080/02640410410001716760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  9 in total

1.  Validation of the SenseWear armband in circuit resistance training with different loads.

Authors:  P J Benito; C Neiva; P S González-Quijano; R Cupeiro; E Morencos; A B Peinado
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  High efficiency in human muscle: an anomaly and an opportunity?

Authors:  Frank E Nelson; Justus D Ortega; Sharon A Jubrias; Kevin E Conley; Martin J Kushmerick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Contribution of anaerobic energy expenditure to whole body thermogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher B Scott
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.169

4.  Differences in oxygen uptake but equivalent energy expenditure between a brief bout of cycling and running.

Authors:  Christopher B Scott; Nathanael D Littlefield; Jeffrey D Chason; Michael P Bunker; Elizabeth M Asselin
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 4.169

5.  Acute Response of Circulating Vascular Regulating MicroRNAs during and after High-Intensity and High-Volume Cycling in Children.

Authors:  Yvonne Kilian; Udo F Wehmeier; Patrick Wahl; Joachim Mester; Thomas Hilberg; Billy Sperlich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Cardiovascular Fitness and Energy Expenditure Response during a Combined Aerobic and Circuit Weight Training Protocol.

Authors:  Pedro J Benito; María Alvarez-Sánchez; Víctor Díaz; Esther Morencos; Ana B Peinado; Rocio Cupeiro; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Accuracy of Tracking Devices' Ability to Assess Exercise Energy Expenditure in Professional Female Soccer Players: Implications for Quantifying Energy Availability.

Authors:  Marcus S Dasa; Oddgeir Friborg; Morten Kristoffersen; Gunn Pettersen; Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen; Jan H Rosenvinge
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Misconceptions about Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy Expenditure.

Authors:  Christopher Scott
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  Supersets do not change energy expenditure during strength training sessions in physically active individuals.

Authors:  M A Brentano; Daniel Umpierre; Lucas Porto Santos; André Luiz Lopes; Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.103

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.