Literature DB >> 30280281

Limit to steady-state aerobic power of skeletal muscles.

A Paglietti1.   

Abstract

Like any other kind of cell, muscle cells produce energy by oxidizing the fuel substrate that they absorb together with the needed oxygen from the surroundings. Oxidation occurs entirely within the cell. It means that the reactants and products of reaction must at some time be dissolved in the cell's cytosol. If a cell operates at steady state, its cytosol composition remains constant. Therefore, the cytosol in a muscle that produces work at steady state must contain a constant amount of fuel, oxygen, and product of reaction dissolved in it. The greater the power produced, the higher the concentration of these solutes. There is a limit, however, to the maximum amount of solutes that the cytosol can contain without damaging the cell. General thermodynamic arguments, which are reviewed in this paper, help relate this limit to the dehydration and overhydration limits of the cell. The present analysis shows that the same limits entail a limit to the maximum power that a muscle can produce at steady state. This limit depends on the composition of the fuel mixture used by the muscle. The analysis also determines the number of fuel carbon atoms that must be oxidized in parallel within a cell to produce a given power. It may well happen that a muscle cannot reach the maximum attainable power because it cannot activate all the parallel oxidation paths that are needed to produce it. This may be due to a series of reasons ranging from health issues to a lack of training. The paper shows how the methods of indirect calorimetry can provide all the experimental data needed to determine the actual number of parallel oxidation paths that at steady state must be active in a muscle in a given exercise. A diagram relating muscle power to the number of parallel oxidation paths and fuel composition is finally presented. It provides a means to assess the power capacity of animal muscles and can be applied to evaluate their fitness, stamina, margins for improvement, and athletic potential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic power; Animal power limit; Cell energy production; Muscle power; Steady-state animal power

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30280281      PMCID: PMC6208595          DOI: 10.1007/s10867-018-9510-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Phys        ISSN: 0092-0606            Impact factor:   1.365


  44 in total

1.  The molecular machinery of Keilin's respiratory chain.

Authors:  P R Rich
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 2.  Cellular volume homeostasis.

Authors:  Kevin Strange
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  The effects of asymmetric length trajectories on the initial mechanical efficiency of mouse soleus muscles.

Authors:  Natalie C Holt; Graham N Askew
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  The efficiency of muscle contraction.

Authors:  Nicholas P Smith; Christopher J Barclay; Denis S Loiselle
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  Volume regulation in mammalian skeletal muscle: the role of sodium-potassium-chloride cotransporters during exposure to hypertonic solutions.

Authors:  Michael I Lindinger; Matthew Leung; Karin E Trajcevski; Thomas J Hawke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Respiratory gas-exchange ratios during graded exercise in fed and fasted trained and untrained men.

Authors:  B C Bergman; G A Brooks
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-02

Review 7.  Energetics of contraction.

Authors:  C J Barclay
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 9.090

8.  Skeletal muscle substrate utilization during submaximal exercise in man: effect of endurance training.

Authors:  B Kiens; B Essen-Gustavsson; N J Christensen; B Saltin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Symmorphosis and skeletal muscle V̇O2 max : in vivo and in vitro measures reveal differing constraints in the exercise-trained and untrained human.

Authors:  Jayson R Gifford; Ryan S Garten; Ashley D Nelson; Joel D Trinity; Gwenael Layec; Melissa A H Witman; Joshua C Weavil; Tyler Mangum; Corey Hart; Cory Etheredge; Jake Jessop; Amber Bledsoe; David E Morgan; D Walter Wray; Matthew J Rossman; Russell S Richardson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Modulation of flight muscle power output in budgerigars Melopsittacus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata: in vitro muscle performance.

Authors:  David J Ellerby; Graham N Askew
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.