Literature DB >> 21789081

Penile prostheses.

Carlo Bettocchi1, Fabrizio Palumbo, Marco Spilotros, Silvano Palazzo, Gabriele A Saracino, Pasquale Martino, Michele Battaglia, Francesco P Selvaggi, Pasquale Ditonno.   

Abstract

Penile prosthesis implantation is recognized as a valid option to obtain an artificial erection satisfactory for sexual intercourse in those patients in which a pharmacological approach is contraindicated or ineffective. Penile prostheses are subbject to continuous development and they are achieving ever better mechanical reliability and safety. The devices are divided into two general types: semirigid (malleable and mechanical) and inflatables. The AMS® (American Medical Systems) and Coloplast Ltd® produce the majority of inflatable and semirigid devices.Malleable and mechanical prostheses have the disadvantage that the penis is always erect although it can be orientated in different ways, while the advantages are ease of use and the need for a simpler surgical procedure compared with inflatable prostheses. Three-component prostheses are more sophisticated than semirigid devices. The advantages of these devices are that the prosthesis feels softer than semirigid or two-piece devices when deflated, with a better cosmetic result, and it ensures a more natural erection than others kinds of prosthesis. The disadvantages are the possibility of malfunction and the need for a more complicated surgical technique. Implantation of a penile prosthesis can be performed in a short surgical time under locoregional anaesthesia, and for this reason hospitalization is usually brief and the patient can be discharged 2 days after the operation if complications are not evident. Patient and partner satisfaction reflect the quality and the effectiveness of this treatment. Even though the results are positive in the vast majority of patients, the possibility of several complications makes penile prosthesis implantation a delicate kind of surgery. Complications can happen when the operation is carried out, in the peri-operative and in the postoperative period, and include infections, erosions of the prosthesis and mechanical failure in case of inflatable prosthesis. Penile prostheses available on the market have improved the success of this kind of surgery, thanks to the introduction of new materials and designs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  erectile dysfunction; inflatable prosthesis; penile prosthesis; semirigid prosthesis

Year:  2010        PMID: 21789081      PMCID: PMC3126066          DOI: 10.1177/1756287209359174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Urol        ISSN: 1756-2872


  19 in total

1.  Chapter 1: The management of erectile dysfunction: an AUA update.

Authors:  Drogo K Montague; Jonathan P Jarow; Gregory A Broderick; Roger R Dmochowski; Jeremy P W Heaton; Tom F Lue; Aaron J Milbank; Ajay Nehra; Ira D Sharlip
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Obtaining rigidity in total phalloplasty: experience with 35 patients.

Authors:  P Hoebeke; G de Cuypere; P Ceulemans; S Monstrey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Report of a multicenter clinical evaluation of the Dura-II penile prosthesis.

Authors:  W S Kearse; A L Sago; S J Peretsman; J O Bolton; R G Holcomb; P K Reddy; P H Bernhard; S M Eppel; J H Lewis; M Gladshteyn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  [Flexible penile implants. An experience over 60 cases].

Authors:  L Subrini
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 0.660

Review 5.  [Penile prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction].

Authors:  G Atienza Merino
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.994

6.  Safety and efficacy outcome of mentor alpha-1 inflatable penile prosthesis implantation for impotence treatment.

Authors:  I Goldstein; L Newman; N Baum; M Brooks; L Chaikin; K Goldberg; A McBride; R J Krane
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis.

Authors:  F E Govier; R P Gibbons; R J Correa; T R Pritchett; D Kramer-Levien
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Patient and partner satisfaction after AMS inflatable penile prosthesis implant.

Authors:  Carlo Bettocchi; Fabrizio Palumbo; Marco Spilotros; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Silvano Palazzo; Michele Battaglia; Francesco Paolo Selvaggi; Pasquale Ditonno
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany.

Authors:  Alessandro Natali; Roberto Olianas; Margit Fisch
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 10.  Erectile function after radical prostatectomy: a review.

Authors:  E J H Meuleman; P F A Mulders
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  14 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of AMS Spectra® penile prosthesis implantation and satisfaction rates.

Authors:  F Akdemir; E Okulu; Ö Kayıgil
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Ischaemic priapism: A clinical review.

Authors:  Joanne Ridgley; Nicholas Raison; M Iqbal Sheikh; Prokar Dasgupta; M Shamim Khan; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 3.  A Surgeon's Guide to the Various Antibiotic Dips Available During Penile Prosthesis Implantation.

Authors:  Soum D Lokeshwar; Joshua Bitran; Vinayak Madhusoodanan; Bruce Kava; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  [Sphincter and corpus cavernosum prostheses as components of endoprosthetics in urology].

Authors:  T A Ludwig; R Dahlem
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Clinical Outcome: Patient and Partner Satisfaction after Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Cedric Jorissen; Helene De Bruyna; Evert Baten; Koenraad Van Renterghem
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-10-01

6.  "Bird-Wing" abdominal phalloplasty: A novel surgical technique for penile reconstruction.

Authors:  Minu Bajpai
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-04

7.  Salvage Procedure in Case of Urethrocavernous Fistula after Revision Surgery for Malfunctioning Three-Piece Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Enrico Caraceni; Angelo Marronaro; Luca Leone
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2016-01-27

8.  Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution.

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Burak Arslan; Tarik Yonguc; Zafer Kozacıoglu; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 9.  Prevention, identification, and management of post-operative penile implant complications of infection, hematoma, and device malfunction.

Authors:  Timothy K O'Rourke; Alexander Erbella; Yu Zhang; Matthew S Wosnitzer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 10.  Evolution of penile prosthetic devices.

Authors:  Brian Le; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.