Literature DB >> 28424506

Long-term outcomes of AMS Spectra® penile prosthesis implantation and satisfaction rates.

F Akdemir1, E Okulu1, Ö Kayıgil2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical implantation techniques of AMS Spectra malleable penile prosthesis, its intraoperative and postoperative complications, and the rates of patient and partner satisfaction. Forty-six patients on whom AMS Spectra malleable penile prosthesis implantation was performed between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively examined. Any complications seen intraoperatively and postoperatively were determined. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5, total IIEF erectile function domain scores were calculated preoperatively. IIEF-5, total IIEF erectile function domain and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) scores were calculated in the postoperative third, sixth and twelfth months. The mean age of the patients was 63.6±7.28 (38-80) years. The mean erectile dysfunction period was 4.29±2.51 years, and the mean follow-up period was 3.19±1.6 years. The mean IIEF-5 score was 5.86±0.92 before surgery, and it was 22.5±0.62 at the end of the follow-up. The mean total IIEF erectile function domain score was 6.02±1.09 before surgery, and it was 26.02±0.21 at the end of the follow-up. The mean EDITS score was 71.06±3.16 at the end of the follow-up. The mean EDITS score of the patients partners was 65.08±4.34 at the end of the follow-up. The overall satisfaction rates were 96.2% for the patients and 84.6% for the partners. As a result of this study, the AMS Spectra penile prosthesis implantation is an effective, reliable and economic method. It can be used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in selected patient groups offering high patient and partner satisfaction rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28424506     DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2017.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  32 in total

Review 1.  Erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  T F Lue
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Use of the malleable penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a prospective study of postoperative adjustment.

Authors:  D J Krauss; L J Lantinga; M P Carey; A W Meisler; C M Kelly
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  [Penile prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction].

Authors:  G Atienza Merino
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.994

4.  Prospective long-term results and quality-of-life assessment after Dura-II penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Kenneth H Ferguson; R Duane Cespedes
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany.

Authors:  Alessandro Natali; Roberto Olianas; Margit Fisch
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Experience with Tube (Promedon) malleable penile implant.

Authors:  Ahmad Fathy; Rany Shamloul; Amr AbdelRahim; Ashraf Zeidan; Refaat El-Dakhly; Hussein Ghanem
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among couples from the Middle East--is it different from that reported elsewhere?

Authors:  N Salama
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 8.  Erectile function after radical prostatectomy: a review.

Authors:  E J H Meuleman; P F A Mulders
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Usefulness of a malleable penile prosthesis in patients with a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Young Dong Kim; Seung Ok Yang; Jeong Ki Lee; Tae Young Jung; Hong Bang Shim
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.369

10.  Long term patient satisfaction and quality of life with AMS700CX inflatable penile prosthesis.

Authors:  Antonio Vitarelli; Lucia Divenuto; Francesca Fortunato; Antonio Falco; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Gabriele Antonini; Vincenzo Gentile; Alessandro Sciarra; Stefano Salciccia; Salvatore Sansalone; Maria Rosaria Di Placido; Giulio Garaffa; Arcangelo Pagliarulo
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2013-09-26
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Status for Semirigid Penile Prosthetic Devices.

Authors:  Raul E Fernandez-Crespo; Kristina Buscaino; Justin Parker; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Can malleable penile prosthesis implantation improve voiding dysfunction in men with concurrent erectile dysfunction and buried penis?

Authors:  Eric Chung; Brian Ng Hung Shin; Juan Wang
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 3.  Fundamentals of prosthetic urology.

Authors:  Kole P Akula; Omer A Raheem
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Modern treatment strategies for penile prosthetics in Peyronie's disease: a contemporary clinical review.

Authors:  Matthew J Ziegelmann; M Ryan Farrell; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Modified malleable prosthesis with a fixed mesh: case series for the Ghattas technique.

Authors:  Osama Ghattas; Mohamed Fahmy Doheim; Hossam Kotb; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.