J W Bea1,2, R M Blew2, S B Going2, C-H Hsu3, M C Lee2, V R Lee2, B J Caan4, M L Kwan4, T G Lohman5. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, 85724-5024. 2. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721. 3. University of Arizona Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, 85724. 4. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, 94612. 5. Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721.
Abstract
Body composition may be a better predictor of chronic disease risk than body mass index (BMI) in older populations. OBJECTIVES: We sought to validate spine fat fraction (%) from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) spine scans as a proxy for total abdominal fat. METHODS: Total body DXA scan abdominal fat regions of interest (ROI) that have been previously validated by magnetic resonance imaging were assessed among healthy, postmenopausal women who also had antero-posterior spine scans (n = 103). ROIs were (1) lumbar vertebrae L2-L4 and (2) L2-Iliac Crest (L2-IC), manually selected by two independent raters, and (3) trunk, auto-selected by DXA software. Intra-class correlation coefficients evaluated intra and inter-rater reliability on a random subset (N = 25). Linear regression models, validated by bootstrapping, assessed the relationship between spine fat fraction (%) and total abdominal fat (%) ROIs. RESULTS: Mean age, BMI, and total body fat were 66.1 ± 4.8 y, 25.8 ± 3.8 kg/m2 and 40.0 ± 6.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences within or between raters. Linear regression models adjusted for several participant and scan characteristics were equivalent to using only BMI and spine fat fraction. The model predicted L2-L4 (Adj. R2 : 0.83) and L2-IC (Adj. R2 : 0.84) abdominal fat (%) well; the adjusted R2 for trunk fat (%) was 0.78. Model validation demonstrated minimal over-fitting (Adj. R2 : 0.82, 0.83, and 0.77 for L2-L4, L2-IC, and trunk fat, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The strong correlation between spine fat fraction and DXA abdominal fat measures make it suitable for further development in postmenopausal chronic disease risk prediction models. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 28:918-926, 2016.
Body composition may be a better predictor of chronic disease risk than body mass index (BMI) in older populations. OBJECTIVES: We sought to validate spine fat fraction (%) from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) spine scans as a proxy for total abdominal fat. METHODS: Total body DXA scan abdominal fat regions of interest (ROI) that have been previously validated by magnetic resonance imaging were assessed among healthy, postmenopausal women who also had antero-posterior spine scans (n = 103). ROIs were (1) lumbar vertebrae L2-L4 and (2) L2-Iliac Crest (L2-IC), manually selected by two independent raters, and (3) trunk, auto-selected by DXA software. Intra-class correlation coefficients evaluated intra and inter-rater reliability on a random subset (N = 25). Linear regression models, validated by bootstrapping, assessed the relationship between spine fat fraction (%) and total abdominal fat (%) ROIs. RESULTS: Mean age, BMI, and total body fat were 66.1 ± 4.8 y, 25.8 ± 3.8 kg/m2 and 40.0 ± 6.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences within or between raters. Linear regression models adjusted for several participant and scan characteristics were equivalent to using only BMI and spine fat fraction. The model predicted L2-L4 (Adj. R2 : 0.83) and L2-IC (Adj. R2 : 0.84) abdominal fat (%) well; the adjusted R2 for trunk fat (%) was 0.78. Model validation demonstrated minimal over-fitting (Adj. R2 : 0.82, 0.83, and 0.77 for L2-L4, L2-IC, and trunk fat, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The strong correlation between spine fat fraction and DXA abdominal fat measures make it suitable for further development in postmenopausal chronic disease risk prediction models. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 28:918-926, 2016.
Authors: Salim Yusuf; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Leonelo Bautista; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Patrick Commerford; Chim C Lang; Zvonko Rumboldt; Churchill L Onen; Liu Lisheng; Supachai Tanomsup; Paul Wangai; Fahad Razak; Arya M Sharma; Sonia S Anand Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-11-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jennifer W Bea; Cynthia A Thomson; Betsy C Wertheim; J Skye Nicholas; Kacey C Ernst; Chengcheng Hu; Rebecca D Jackson; Jane A Cauley; Cora E Lewis; Bette Caan; Denise J Roe; Zhao Chen Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Scott Going; Timothy Lohman; Linda Houtkooper; Lauve Metcalfe; Hilary Flint-Wagner; Robert Blew; Vanessa Stanford; Ellen Cussler; Jane Martin; Pedro Teixeira; Margaret Harris; Laura Milliken; Arturo Figueroa-Galvez; Judith Weber Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-07-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Bette J Caan; Jennifer A Emond; Loki Natarajan; Adrienne Castillo; Erica P Gunderson; Laurel Habel; Lovell Jones; Vicky A Newman; Cheryl L Rock; Martha L Slattery; Marcia L Stefanick; Barbara Sternfeld; Cynthia A Thomson; John P Pierce Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 4.872