Literature DB >> 26860499

Has Choosing Wisely® affected rates of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry use?

E C Lasser1,2, E R Pfoh3,4, H Y Chang3, K S Chan3, J C Bailey5, H Kharrazi3,6, J P Weiner3,6, S M Dy3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Reducing overuse of tests such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in younger women is an important quality issue. We evaluated trends in DXA ordering before and after Choosing Wisely recommendations were released. We found no significant difference in ordering trends suggesting that other initiatives are needed to change behavior.
INTRODUCTION: Reducing overuse of tests such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in younger women is an important quality issue, but trends in care are difficult to change. We evaluated (1) trends in DXA ordering before and after the Choosing Wisely recommendation release and (2) patterns of key characteristics that indicate a potentially appropriate DXA scan order.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective longitudinal analysis of electronic health record data at a multi-specialty, ambulatory care network of 34 practices across Maryland and Washington, DC. Since the Choosing Wisely DXA recommendation was released April 2012, the study periods were April-December 2011 (pre-initiative) and April-December 2012 (post-initiative). Women between 50 and 64 years with primary care encounters, and primary care providers who saw ten or more women in the study population in both pre and post periods were included.
RESULTS: For 42,320 eligible patients, the mean provider ordering rate was 2.6 % pre-initiative and 2.0 % post-initiative; there was no significant difference in trend over time. Over 70 % of the population had no characteristics associated with potentially appropriate DXA ordering. Low body mass index, current smoker status, and osteopenia were the most common characteristics indicating potentially appropriate DXA orders. Patients with any of these three characteristics had DXA ordering rates between 3-20 %.
CONCLUSIONS: The trend in provider ordering rates of DXA scans did not decrease after the release of the DXA Choosing Wisely recommendation. Targeted initiatives addressing providers with high ordering rates will be needed to change behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone density; Choosing Wisely; DXA; General medicine; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26860499     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3511-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  12 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Appropriateness criteria to assess variations in surgical procedure use in the United States.

Authors:  Elise H Lawson; Melinda Maggard Gibbons; Angela M Ingraham; Paul G Shekelle; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-12

3.  Osteoporosis screening and treatment guidelines: are they being followed?

Authors:  Peter F Schnatz; Kimberly A Marakovits; Melissa Dubois; David M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Variation in outcomes of quality measurement by data source.

Authors:  Heather Angier; Rachel Gold; Charles Gallia; Allison Casciato; Carrie J Tillotson; Miguel Marino; Rita Mangione-Smith; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Electronic health records vs Medicaid claims: completeness of diabetes preventive care data in community health centers.

Authors:  Jennifer E Devoe; Rachel Gold; Patti McIntire; Jon Puro; Susan Chauvie; Charles A Gallia
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Trends in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the United States, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Cynthia D O'Malley; Stephen S Johnston; Gregory Lenhart; Gregory Cherkowski; Liisa Palmer; Sarah L Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Overuse of short-interval bone densitometry: assessing rates of low-value care.

Authors:  N E Morden; W L Schpero; R Zaha; T D Sequist; C H Colla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Overuse of health care services: when less is more … more or less.

Authors:  Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Peter B Bach
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01

10.  Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign.

Authors:  Daniel Wolfson; John Santa; Lorie Slass
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  5 in total

1.  Barriers and Facilitators to De-Implementation of the Choosing Wisely® Guidelines for Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Margaret E Smith; C Ann Vitous; Tasha M Hughes; Sarah P Shubeck; Reshma Jagsi; Lesly A Dossett
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Quality Measures and Quality Improvement Initiatives in Osteoporosis-an Update.

Authors:  S French; S Choden; Gabriela Schmajuk
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Active change interventions to de-implement low-value healthcare practices: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Gillian Parker; Tim Rappon; Whitney Berta
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

Review 5.  Using theories and frameworks to understand how to reduce low-value healthcare: a scoping review.

Authors:  Gillian Parker; Nida Shahid; Tim Rappon; Monika Kastner; Karen Born; Whitney Berta
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 7.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.