Literature DB >> 21787308

A sampling-based method for ranking protein structural models by integrating multiple scores and features.

Xiaohu Shi1, Jingfen Zhang, Zhiquan He, Yi Shang, Dong Xu.   

Abstract

One of the major challenges in protein tertiary structure prediction is structure quality assessment. In many cases, protein structure prediction tools generate good structural models, but fail to select the best models from a huge number of candidates as the final output. In this study, we developed a sampling-based machine-learning method to rank protein structural models by integrating multiple scores and features. First, features such as predicted secondary structure, solvent accessibility and residue-residue contact information are integrated by two Radial Basis Function (RBF) models trained from different datasets. Then, the two RBF scores and five selected scoring functions developed by others, i.e., Opus-CA, Opus-PSP, DFIRE, RAPDF, and Cheng Score are synthesized by a sampling method. At last, another integrated RBF model ranks the structural models according to the features of sampling distribution. We tested the proposed method by using two different datasets, including the CASP server prediction models of all CASP8 targets and a set of models generated by our in-house software MUFOLD. The test result shows that our method outperforms any individual scoring function on both best model selection, and overall correlation between the predicted ranking and the actual ranking of structural quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21787308      PMCID: PMC4368063          DOI: 10.2174/138920311796957658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci        ISSN: 1389-2037            Impact factor:   3.272


  28 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.

Authors:  H Lu; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

3.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Calpha positions.

Authors:  Yinghao Wu; Mingyang Lu; Mingzhi Chen; Jialin Li; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Real-SPINE: an integrated system of neural networks for real-value prediction of protein structural properties.

Authors:  Ofer Dor; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-07-01

7.  Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ.

Authors:  Per Larsson; Marcin J Skwark; Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

8.  How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted?

Authors:  David Eramian; Narayanan Eswar; Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Silvio C E Tosatto; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

10.  Threading without optimizing weighting factors for scoring function.

Authors:  Yifeng David Yang; Changsoon Park; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-11-15
View more
  2 in total

1.  Protein structural model selection by combining consensus and single scoring methods.

Authors:  Zhiquan He; Meshari Alazmi; Jingfen Zhang; Dong Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Random forest-based protein model quality assessment (RFMQA) using structural features and potential energy terms.

Authors:  Balachandran Manavalan; Juyong Lee; Jooyoung Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.