Literature DB >> 18473394

Threading without optimizing weighting factors for scoring function.

Yifeng David Yang1, Changsoon Park, Daisuke Kihara.   

Abstract

Optimizing weighting factors for a linear combination of terms in a scoring function is a crucial step for success in developing a threading algorithm. Usually weighting factors are optimized to yield the highest success rate on a training dataset, and the determined constant values for the weighting factors are used for any target sequence. Here we explore completely different approaches to handle weighting factors for a scoring function of threading. Throughout this study we use a model system of gapless threading using a scoring function with two terms combined by a weighting factor, a main chain angle potential and a residue contact potential. First, we demonstrate that the optimal weighting factor for recognizing the native structure differs from target sequence to target sequence. Then, we present three novel threading methods which circumvent training dataset-based weighting factor optimization. The basic idea of the three methods is to employ different weighting factor values and finally select a template structure for a target sequence by examining characteristics of the distribution of scores computed by using the different weighting factor values. Interestingly, the success rate of our approaches is comparable to the conventional threading method where the weighting factor is optimized based on a training dataset. Moreover, when the size of the training set available for the conventional threading method is small, our approach often performs better. In addition, we predict a target-specific weighting factor optimal for a target sequence by an artificial neural network from features of the target sequence. Finally, we show that our novel methods can be used to assess the confidence of prediction of a conventional threading with an optimized constant weighting factor by considering consensus prediction between them. Implication to the underlined energy landscape of protein folding is discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18473394     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  6 in total

1.  Effect of using suboptimal alignments in template-based protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-01

2.  Detecting local residue environment similarity for recognizing near-native structure models.

Authors:  Hyungrae Kim; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-10-30

3.  A sampling-based method for ranking protein structural models by integrating multiple scores and features.

Authors:  Xiaohu Shi; Jingfen Zhang; Zhiquan He; Yi Shang; Dong Xu
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Effective inter-residue contact definitions for accurate protein fold recognition.

Authors:  Chao Yuan; Hao Chen; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Quantification of protein group coherence and pathway assignment using functional association.

Authors:  Meghana Chitale; Shriphani Palakodety; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Torsten Schwede; Silvio Ce Tosatto
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-05-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.