Literature DB >> 19544566

Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ.

Per Larsson1, Marcin J Skwark, Björn Wallner, Arne Elofsson.   

Abstract

Model Quality Assessment Programs (MQAPs) are programs developed to rank protein models. These methods can be trained to predict the overall global quality of a model or what local regions in a model that are likely to be incorrect. In CASP8, we participated with two predictors that predict both global and local quality using either consensus information, Pcons, or purely structural information, ProQ. Consistently with results in previous CASPs, the best performance in CASP8 was obtained using the Pcons method. Furthermore, the results show that the modification introduced into Pcons for CASP8 improved the predictions against GDT_TS and now a correlation coefficient above 0.9 is achieved, whereas the correlation for ProQ is about 0.7. The correlation is better for the easier than for the harder targets, but it is not below 0.5 for a single target and below 0.7 only for three targets. The correlation coefficient for the best local quality MQAP is 0.68 showing that there is still clear room for improvement within this area. We also detect that Pcons still is not always able to identify the best model. However, we show that using a linear combination of Pcons and ProQ it is possible to select models that are better than the models from the best single server. In particular, the average quality over the hard targets increases by about 6% compared with using Pcons alone. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19544566     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  30 in total

1.  Fast geometric consensus approach for protein model quality assessment.

Authors:  Rafal Adamczak; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Brinda K Vallat; Jaroslaw Meller
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Assessment of template-based modeling of protein structure in CASP11.

Authors:  Vivek Modi; Qifang Xu; Sam Adhikari; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-15

3.  A sampling-based method for ranking protein structural models by integrating multiple scores and features.

Authors:  Xiaohu Shi; Jingfen Zhang; Zhiquan He; Yi Shang; Dong Xu
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-14

5.  A multilayer evaluation approach for protein structure prediction and model quality assessment.

Authors:  Jingfen Zhang; Qingguo Wang; Kittinun Vantasin; Jiong Zhang; Zhiquan He; Ioan Kosztin; Yi Shang; Dong Xu
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-14

6.  MUFOLD-WQA: A new selective consensus method for quality assessment in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Qingguo Wang; Kittinun Vantasin; Dong Xu; Yi Shang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-14

Review 7.  Modelling three-dimensional protein structures for applications in drug design.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; Andreas Bergner; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 7.851

8.  Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservation.

Authors:  Matan Kalman; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Massive integration of diverse protein quality assessment methods to improve template based modeling in CASP11.

Authors:  Renzhi Cao; Debswapna Bhattacharya; Badri Adhikari; Jilong Li; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-29

10.  Evaluation system and web infrastructure for the second cryo-EM model challenge.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Paul D Adams; Catherine L Lawson; Wah Chiu
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.