OBJECTIVE: There are known interoperator, intraoperator, and intervendor software differences that can influence the reproducibility of quantitative CT perfusion values. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative impact of operator and software differences in CT perfusion variability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT perfusion imaging data were selected for 11 patients evaluated for suspected ischemic stroke. Three radiologists each independently postprocessed the source data twice, using four different vendor software applications. Results for cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and mean transit time (MTT) were recorded for the lentiform nuclei in both hemispheres. Repeated variables multivariate analysis of variance was used to assess differences in the means of CBV, CBF, and MTT. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between pairs of vendors, readers, and read times. RESULTS: Choice of vendor software, but not interoperator or intraoperator disagreement, was associated with significant variability (p < 0.001) in CBV, CBF, and MTT. The mean difference in CT perfusion values was greater for pairs of vendors than for pairs of operators. CONCLUSION: Different vendor software applications do not generate quantitative perfusion results equivalently. Intervendor difference is, by far, the largest cause of variability in perfusion results relative to interoperator and intraoperator difference. Caution should be exercised when interpreting quantitative CT perfusion results because these values may vary considerably depending on the postprocessing software.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: There are known interoperator, intraoperator, and intervendor software differences that can influence the reproducibility of quantitative CT perfusion values. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative impact of operator and software differences in CT perfusion variability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT perfusion imaging data were selected for 11 patients evaluated for suspected ischemic stroke. Three radiologists each independently postprocessed the source data twice, using four different vendor software applications. Results for cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and mean transit time (MTT) were recorded for the lentiform nuclei in both hemispheres. Repeated variables multivariate analysis of variance was used to assess differences in the means of CBV, CBF, and MTT. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between pairs of vendors, readers, and read times. RESULTS: Choice of vendor software, but not interoperator or intraoperator disagreement, was associated with significant variability (p < 0.001) in CBV, CBF, and MTT. The mean difference in CT perfusion values was greater for pairs of vendors than for pairs of operators. CONCLUSION: Different vendor software applications do not generate quantitative perfusion results equivalently. Intervendor difference is, by far, the largest cause of variability in perfusion results relative to interoperator and intraoperator difference. Caution should be exercised when interpreting quantitative CT perfusion results because these values may vary considerably depending on the postprocessing software.
Authors: Elisa Almeida Sathler Bretas; Ulysses S Torres; Lucas Rios Torres; Daniel Bekhor; Celso Fernando Saito Filho; Douglas Jorge Racy; Lorenzo Faggioni; Giuseppe D'Ippolito Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: F Fahmi; H A Marquering; G J Streekstra; L F M Beenen; B K Velthuis; E VanBavel; C B Majoie Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Branko N Huisa; William P Neil; Ronald Schrader; Marcel Maya; Benedict Pereira; Nhu T Bruce; Patrick D Lyden Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 2.136