BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The minimal scan duration needed to obtain reliable lesion volumes with computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) has not been well established in the literature. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the impact of gradual truncation of the scan duration on acute ischemic lesion volume measurements. For each scan, we identified its optimal scan time, defined as the shortest scan duration that yields measurements of the ischemic lesion volumes similar to those obtained with longer scanning, and the relative height of the fitted venous output function at its optimal scan time. RESULTS: We analyzed 70 computed tomographic perfusion scans of acute stroke patients. An optimal scan time could not be determined in 11 scans (16%). For the other 59 scans, the median optimal scan time was 32.7 seconds (90th percentile 52.6 seconds; 100th percentile 68.9 seconds), and the median relative height of the fitted venous output function at the optimal scan times was 0.39 (90th percentile 0.02; 100th percentile 0.00). On the basis of a linear model, the optimal scan time was T0 plus 1.6 times the width of the venous output function (P<0.001; R2=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows how the optimal duration of a computed tomographic perfusion scan relates to the arrival time and width of the contrast bolus. This knowledge can be used to optimize computed tomographic perfusion scan protocols and to determine whether a scan is of sufficient duration. Provided a baseline (T0) of 10 seconds, a total scan duration of 60 to 70 seconds, which includes the entire downslope of the venous output function in most patients, is recommended.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The minimal scan duration needed to obtain reliable lesion volumes with computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) has not been well established in the literature. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the impact of gradual truncation of the scan duration on acute ischemic lesion volume measurements. For each scan, we identified its optimal scan time, defined as the shortest scan duration that yields measurements of the ischemic lesion volumes similar to those obtained with longer scanning, and the relative height of the fitted venous output function at its optimal scan time. RESULTS: We analyzed 70 computed tomographic perfusion scans of acute strokepatients. An optimal scan time could not be determined in 11 scans (16%). For the other 59 scans, the median optimal scan time was 32.7 seconds (90th percentile 52.6 seconds; 100th percentile 68.9 seconds), and the median relative height of the fitted venous output function at the optimal scan times was 0.39 (90th percentile 0.02; 100th percentile 0.00). On the basis of a linear model, the optimal scan time was T0 plus 1.6 times the width of the venous output function (P<0.001; R2=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows how the optimal duration of a computed tomographic perfusion scan relates to the arrival time and width of the contrast bolus. This knowledge can be used to optimize computed tomographic perfusion scan protocols and to determine whether a scan is of sufficient duration. Provided a baseline (T0) of 10 seconds, a total scan duration of 60 to 70 seconds, which includes the entire downslope of the venous output function in most patients, is recommended.
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Søren Christensen; Christopher R Levi; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Mark W Parsons Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter Schramm; Peter D Schellinger; Jochen B Fiebach; Sabine Heiland; Olav Jansen; Michael Knauth; Werner Hacke; Klaus Sartor Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Max Wintermark; Gregory W Albers; Andrei V Alexandrov; Jeffry R Alger; Roland Bammer; Jean-Claude Baron; Stephen Davis; Bart M Demaerschalk; Colin P Derdeyn; Geoffrey A Donnan; James D Eastwood; Jochen B Fiebach; Marc Fisher; Karen L Furie; Gregory V Goldmakher; Werner Hacke; Chelsea S Kidwell; Stephan P Kloska; Martin Köhrmann; Walter Koroshetz; Ting-Yim Lee; Kennedy R Lees; Michael H Lev; David S Liebeskind; Leif Ostergaard; William J Powers; James Provenzale; Peter Schellinger; Robert Silbergleit; Alma Gregory Sorensen; Joanna Wardlaw; Ona Wu; Steven Warach Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: J B Hartman; S Moran; C Zhu; J Sharp; D S Hippe; D A Zamora; M Mossa-Basha Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jason W Allen; Adam Prater; Omar Kallas; Syed A Abidi; Brian M Howard; Frank Tong; Shashank Agarwal; Shadi Yaghi; Seena Dehkharghani Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Maarten G Lansberg; Gregory W Albers; Joseph P Broderick; Colin P Derdeyn; Pooja Khatri; Amrou Sarraj; Jeffrey L Saver; Achala Vagal Journal: Stroke Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 10.170