Literature DB >> 27759566

Reproducibility and variability of very low dose hepatic perfusion CT in metastatic liver disease.

Osman Melih Topcuoğlu1, Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba, Deniz Akata, Mustafa Nasuh Özmen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the intra- and interobserver agreement on the software analysis of very low dose hepatic perfusion CT (pCT).
METHODS: A total of 53 pCT examinations were obtained from 21 patients (16 men, 5 women; mean age, 60.4 years) with proven liver metastasis from various primary cancers. The pCT examinations were analyzed by two readers independently and perfusion parameters were noted for whole liver, whole metastasis, metastasis wall, and normal-looking liver (liver tissue without metastasis) in regions of interest (ROIs). Readers repeated the analysis after an interval of one month. Intra- and interobserver agreements were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman statistics.
RESULTS: The mean ICCs of all ROIs between readers were 0.91, 0.93, 0.86, 0.45, 0.53, and 0.66 for blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), permeability, arterial liver perfusion (ALP), portal venous perfusion (PVP) and hepatic perfusion index (HPI), respectively. The mean ICCs of all ROIs between readings were 0.86, 0.91, 0.81, 0.53, 0.56, and 0.71 for BF, BV, permeability, ALP, PVP, and HPI, respectively. There was greater agreement on the parameters measured for the whole metastasis than on the parameters measured for the metastasis wall. The effective dose of all perfusion CT studies was 2.9 mSv.
CONCLUSION: There is greater intra- and interobserver agreement for BF and BV than for permeability, ALP, PVP, and HPI at very low dose hepatic pCT. Permeability, ALP, PVP, and HPI parameters cannot be used in clinical practice for hepatic pCT with an effective dose of 2.9 mSv.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27759566      PMCID: PMC5098942          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2016.16612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  30 in total

Review 1.  Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement?

Authors:  K A Miles; M R Griffiths
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Quantitative colorectal cancer perfusion measurement using dynamic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography: effect of acquisition time and implications for protocols.

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Steve Halligan; Jo-Ann Hugill; Louise Gartner; Clive I Bartram
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Differentiation between diverticulitis and colorectal cancer: quantitative CT perfusion measurements versus morphologic criteria--initial experience.

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor; David Burling; Paul Bassett; Clive I Bartram
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Dynamic perfusion CT: optimizing the temporal resolution for the calculation of perfusion CT parameters in stroke patients.

Authors:  Andreas Kämena; Florian Streitparth; Christian Grieser; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Basil Jamil; Katarzyna Wojtal; Jens Ricke; Maciej Pech
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Quantitative assessment of colorectal cancer perfusion using MDCT: inter- and intraobserver agreement.

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Steve Halligan; Jo-Ann Hugill; Paul Bassett; Clive I Bartram
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Quantitative tumor perfusion assessment with multidetector CT: are measurements from two commercial software packages interchangeable?

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Steve Halligan; Clive I Bartram
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Estimation of radiation exposure of 128-slice 4D-perfusion CT for the assessment of tumor vascularity.

Authors:  Dominik Ketelsen; Marius Horger; Markus Buchgeister; Michael Fenchel; Christoph Thomas; Nadine Boehringer; Maximilian Schulze; Ilias Tsiflikas; Claus D Claussen; Martin Heuschmid
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Colorectal tumor vascularity: quantitative assessment with multidetector CT--do tumor perfusion measurements reflect angiogenesis?

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Steve Halligan; Frances Daley; David M Wellsted; Thomas Guenther; Clive I Bartram
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors.

Authors:  Gaspard d'Assignies; Anne Couvelard; Stéphane Bahrami; Marie-Pierre Vullierme; Pascal Hammel; Olivia Hentic; Alain Sauvanet; Pierre Bedossa; Philippe Ruszniewski; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Effect of temporal interval between scan acquisitions on quantitative vascular parameters in colorectal cancer: implications for helical volumetric perfusion CT techniques.

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Jonathan Liaw; Clive I Bartram; Steve Halligan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is liver perfusion CT reproducible? A study on intra- and interobserver agreement of normal hepatic haemodynamic parameters obtained with two different software packages.

Authors:  Elisa Almeida Sathler Bretas; Ulysses S Torres; Lucas Rios Torres; Daniel Bekhor; Celso Fernando Saito Filho; Douglas Jorge Racy; Lorenzo Faggioni; Giuseppe D'Ippolito
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Current Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Evangelos Chartampilas; Vasileios Rafailidis; Vivian Georgopoulou; Georgios Kalarakis; Adam Hatzidakis; Panos Prassopoulos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.