BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although CT perfusion is a promising tool to support treatment decisions for patients with acute ischemic stroke, it still lacks a standardized method for CTP analysis. The purpose of this study was to assess the variability of the area of infarct core and penumbra as presented in summary maps produced by 2 different software packages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one CTP image datasets of 26 consecutive patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke were retrospectively evaluated. Identical image datasets were analyzed by using 2 different commercially available CTP analysis software packages, each representing a mainstream of widely used algorithms: delay-sensitive and delay-insensitive. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the level of agreement between the 2 methods in determining the area of infarct core and penumbra area in the summary maps. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in infarct core area (-23.6 ± 25.6 cm(2)) and penumbra area (15.8 ± 25.3 cm(2)) between the 2 software packages. For all the areas presented in the summary maps, the Bland-Altman interval limit of agreement was larger than 100 cm(2). CONCLUSIONS: The infarct core and penumbra area of CTP summary maps generated by 2 commonly used software packages were significantly different, emphasizing the need for standardization and validation of CTP analysis before it can be applied to patient management in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although CT perfusion is a promising tool to support treatment decisions for patients with acute ischemic stroke, it still lacks a standardized method for CTP analysis. The purpose of this study was to assess the variability of the area of infarct core and penumbra as presented in summary maps produced by 2 different software packages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one CTP image datasets of 26 consecutive patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke were retrospectively evaluated. Identical image datasets were analyzed by using 2 different commercially available CTP analysis software packages, each representing a mainstream of widely used algorithms: delay-sensitive and delay-insensitive. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the level of agreement between the 2 methods in determining the area of infarct core and penumbra area in the summary maps. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in infarct core area (-23.6 ± 25.6 cm(2)) and penumbra area (15.8 ± 25.3 cm(2)) between the 2 software packages. For all the areas presented in the summary maps, the Bland-Altman interval limit of agreement was larger than 100 cm(2). CONCLUSIONS: The infarct core and penumbra area of CTP summary maps generated by 2 commonly used software packages were significantly different, emphasizing the need for standardization and validation of CTP analysis before it can be applied to patient management in clinical practice.
Authors: Z Serafin; M Kotarski; M Karolkiewicz; R Mindykowski; W Lasek; S Molski; M Gajdzińska; A Nowak-Nowacka Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Max Wintermark; Nancy J Fischbein; Wade S Smith; Nerissa U Ko; Marcel Quist; William P Dillon Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: B D Murphy; A J Fox; D H Lee; D J Sahlas; S E Black; M J Hogan; S B Coutts; A M Demchuk; M Goyal; R I Aviv; S Symons; I B Gulka; V Beletsky; D Pelz; V Hachinski; R Chan; T-Y Lee Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-06-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Peter Schramm; Peter D Schellinger; Jochen B Fiebach; Sabine Heiland; Olav Jansen; Michael Knauth; Werner Hacke; Klaus Sartor Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Max Wintermark; Adam E Flanders; Birgitta Velthuis; Reto Meuli; Maarten van Leeuwen; Dorit Goldsher; Carissa Pineda; Joaquin Serena; Irene van der Schaaf; Annet Waaijer; James Anderson; Gary Nesbit; Igal Gabriely; Victoria Medina; Ana Quiles; Scott Pohlman; Marcel Quist; Pierre Schnyder; Julien Bogousslavsky; William P Dillon; Salvador Pedraza Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-03-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Pamela W Schaefer; Kit Mui; Shahmir Kamalian; Raul G Nogueira; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Michael H Lev Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-06-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Olvert A Berkhemer; Shervin Kamalian; R Gilberto González; Charles B L M Majoie; Albert J Yoo Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: George M Ghobrial; Nohra Chalouhi; Lana Rivers; Samantha Witte; Justin Davanzo; Richard Dalyai; Michelle L Gardecki; Pascal Jabbour; Fernando Gonzalez; Aaron S Dumont; Robert H Rosenwasser; Stavropoula Tjoumakaris Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 5.836