Literature DB >> 21779149

Set-specific capture can be reduced by preemptively occupying a limited-capacity focus of attention.

Katherine Sledge Moore1, Daniel H Weissman.   

Abstract

Recent work has shown that contingent attentional capture effects can be especially large when multiple attentional sets for color guide visual search (Moore & Weissman, 2010). In particular, this research suggests that detecting a target-colored (e.g., orange) distractor leads the corresponding attentional set (e.g., identify orange letters) to enter a limited-capacity focus of attention in working memory, where it remains briefly while the distractor is being attended. Consequently, the ability to identify a differently-colored (e.g., green) target 100-300 ms later is impaired because the appropriate set (e.g., identify green letters) cannot also enter the focus of attention. In two experiments, we investigated whether such set-specific capture can be reduced by preemptively occupying the focus of attention. As predicted, a target-colored central distractor presented 233 ms before a target-colored peripheral distractor eliminated set-specific capture arising from the peripheral distractor. Moreover, this effect was observed only when the central distractor's color (e.g., orange) (a) matched a different set than the upcoming peripheral distractor's color (e.g., green) and (b) matched the same set as the upcoming central target's color (e.g., orange). We conclude that the same working memory limitations that give rise to set-specific capture can be preemptively exploited to reduce it.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21779149      PMCID: PMC3138646          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2011.558862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  44 in total

1.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition.

Authors:  U Mayr; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Manfred Heumann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.

Authors:  R Houtkamp; P R Roelfsema
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential.

Authors:  Stefan Berti
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Task-set reconfiguration suspends perceptual processing: evidence from semantic priming during the attentional blink.

Authors:  François Vachon; Sébastien Tremblay; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.

Authors:  B S Gibson; E M Kelsey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Shifting attention in a rapid visual search paradigm.

Authors:  S Hsieh; A Allport
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-08

10.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Searching for two things at once: establishment of multiple attentional control settings on a trial-by-trial basis.

Authors:  Zachary J J Roper; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

2.  Spatiotemporal competition and task-relevance shape the spatial distribution of emotional interference during rapid visual processing: Evidence from gaze-contingent eye-tracking.

Authors:  Briana L Kennedy; Daniel Pearson; David J Sutton; Tom Beesley; Steven B Most
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking.

Authors:  Katherine S Moore; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Ariel Kershner; Korissa Belville; Jaimie Jasina; Aziza Ransome; Jessica Avanzato
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  The costs of switching attentional sets.

Authors:  Isabel Dombrowe; Mieke Donk; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Contingent capture of involuntary visual attention interferes with detection of auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Jill Harris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-02

6.  Attention expedites target selection by prioritizing the neural processing of distractor features.

Authors:  Mandy V Bartsch; Christian Merkel; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Jens-Max Hopf
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-29

7.  A bottleneck model of set-specific capture.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?

Authors:  Gesche N Winther; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

9.  Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Kamila Śmigasiewicz; Lars Michael; Laura Heikaus; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.