Literature DB >> 7991326

Shifting attention in a rapid visual search paradigm.

S Hsieh1, A Allport.   

Abstract

A method is introduced for studying shifts of attention in semantic space, testing 56 subjects in four experiments on a semantic monitoring task based on rapid, serial, visually presented (RSVP) word-sequences. Following a cue to shift attention, accuracy of semantic monitoring drops abruptly to a low level, then gradually recovers to reach preshift levels over successive stimuli in the RSVP sequence. Using this method, we compared two kinds of criterion-shifts, one requiring a set-reversal ('reversal shifts'), the other involving a shift between orthogonally defined categories ('orthogonal shifts'); no differences were found. We have also examined the difference in a shift between two different processing domains (semantic vs typographic) compared with a shift of criterion within the same processing domain. The results showed no differences for within- vs between-domain shifts. Finally, we studied the time-course of a semantic attention shift. Execution of a semantic shift did not follow an internally controlled time-course but was a direct function of the rate of stimulus presentation. No evidence was found for the operation of a 'supervisory attentional system' independent of external stimulus triggering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7991326     DOI: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  5 in total

1.  Toward a taxonomy of attention shifting: individual differences in fMRI during multiple shift types.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; John Jonides; Edward E Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Individual differences in multiple types of shifting attention.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; John Jonides; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

3.  Set-specific capture can be reduced by preemptively occupying a limited-capacity focus of attention.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-01-01

4.  Schizophrenia patients show task switching deficits consistent with N-methyl-d-aspartate system dysfunction but not global executive deficits: implications for pathophysiology of executive dysfunction in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; E A Clark; P D Butler; D C Javitt
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Task switching reveals abnormal brain-heart electrophysiological signatures in cognitively healthy individuals with abnormal CSF amyloid/tau, a pilot study.

Authors:  Rebecca Johnson Arechavala; Roger Rochart; Robert A Kloner; Anqi Liu; Daw-An Wu; Shao-Min Hung; Shinsuke Shimojo; Alfred N Fonteh; Michael T Kleinman; Michael G Harrington; Xianghong Arakaki
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.997

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.