Literature DB >> 17915601

The effects of visual display distance on eye accommodation, head posture, and vision and neck symptoms.

David Rempel1, Kirsten Willms, Jeffrey Anshel, Wolfgang Jaschinski, James Sheedy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine the effects of display viewing distance on both the visual and musculoskeletal systems while the text height is held constant across viewing distances.
BACKGROUND: The distance from the eyes to a computer display may affect visual and neck comfort. If the angular size of the characters remains the same, it is recommended that the display be placed at a farther viewing distance (e.g., 70-100 cm). However, in common usage, the character sizes are not adjusted based on viewing distance.
METHOD: Participants under the age of 35 years (N = 24) performed visually demanding tasks using a computer display for 2 hr each at three viewing distances (mean: 52.4, 73.0, and 85.3 cm) while torso and head posture were tracked. At the end of each task, eye accommodation was measured and symptoms were recorded.
RESULTS: The near distance was associated with significantly less blurred vision, less dry or irritated eyes, less headache, and improved convergence recovery when compared with the middle and far distances. Participants moved their torsos and heads closer to the monitor at the far distance.
CONCLUSION: If the computer screen character sizes are close to the limits of visual acuity, it is recommended that the computer monitor be positioned between the near (52 cm) and middle (73 cm) distance from the eyes. APPLICATION: The location of a computer display should take into account the size of the characters on the screen and the visual acuity of the user.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17915601     DOI: 10.1518/001872007X230208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  9 in total

1.  Eye-lens accommodation load and static trapezius muscle activity.

Authors:  H O Richter; T Bänziger; M Forsman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The modulation of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders for a knowledge worker with chiropractic care and applied ergonomics: a case study.

Authors:  Charles W Sherrod; George Casey; Robert E Dubro; Dale F Johnson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2013-03

3.  The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays.

Authors:  Takashi Shibata; Joohwan Kim; David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Prevalence of Asthenopia and Its Relationship with Electronic Screen Usage During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ismail Abuallut; Elham A Qumayi; Azah Jabir Mohana; Norah M Almalki; Majdah E Ghilan; Fatimah H Dallak; Sarah Mohammed Mahzari; Almoayad Makrami; Amal Tawhari; Reham Eissa Ajeebi; Sultan Mousa Bakri
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-27

5.  Effects of digital devices and online learning on computer vision syndrome in students during the COVID-19 era: an online questionnaire study.

Authors:  Kasem Seresirikachorn; Warakorn Thiamthat; Wararee Sriyuttagrai; Ngamphol Soonthornworasiri; Panisa Singhanetr; Narata Yudtanahiran; Thanaruk Theeramunkong
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2022-06

6.  Vision-related problems among the workers engaged in jewellery manufacturing.

Authors:  Urmi Ravindra Salve
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr

7.  Natural Perspective: Mapping Visual Space with Art and Science.

Authors:  Alistair Burleigh; Robert Pepperell; Nicole Ruta
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-07

8.  Effects of Combined Balance and Strength Training on Measures of Balance and Muscle Strength in Older Women With a History of Falls.

Authors:  Sghaier Zouita; Hassane Zouhal; Habiba Ferchichi; Thierry Paillard; Catherine Dziri; Anthony C Hackney; Ismail Laher; Urs Granacher; Amira Ben Moussa Zouita
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Ocular accommodation and cognitive demand: an additional indicator besides pupil size and cardiovascular measures?

Authors:  Stephanie Jainta; Joerg Hoormann; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2008-08-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.