| Literature DB >> 34072168 |
Mat Yunus Najhah1, Hawa Z E Jaafar1, Jaafar Juju Nakasha1, Mansor Hakiman1,2.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate whether the in vitro-cultured L. pumila var.Entities:
Keywords: Labisia pumila var. alata; antioxidant activities; callus induction; plant growth regulator; polyphenolic activities; shoot multiplication
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34072168 PMCID: PMC8198644 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26113229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
The effects of BAP, kinetin, and zeatin on shoot multiplication from nodal segment of Labisia pumila var. alata after 6 weeks of culture.
| Growth Regulators (mg/L) | No. of Shoots | Length of Shoot (cm) | No. of Leaves | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | Kin | Zea | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.56 abcd | 3.89 ab | 2.1 bc |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.15 abc | 3.55 abc | 1.6 bcdef |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2.03 g | 2.15 efg | 1.0 def |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 3.92 bcdef | 2.51 defg | 1.73 bcde |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 4.06 abcdef | 2.49 defg | 1.4 cdef |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 3.25 efg | 2.37 defg | 1.42 cdef |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.19 abcdef | 3.19 abcd | 1.8 bcd |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.32 efg | 2.61 cdefg | 0.93 ef |
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.13 fg | 2.54 defg | 0.93 ef |
| 0 | 3 | 0 | 3.61 def | 2.26 efg | 1.1 def |
| 0 | 4 | 0 | 3.75 cdef | 2.71 cdefg | 1.4 cdef |
| 0 | 5 | 0 | 2.12 g | 2.13 fg | 0.8 f |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.74 fg | 2.10 g | 1.4 cdef |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.36 abcde | 4.32 a | 2.4 b |
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 6.53 ab | 3.50 abc | 3.13 a |
| 0 | 0 | 3 | 6.64 a | 2.95 bcde | 2.27 b |
| 0 | 0 | 4 | 5.29 abcde | 2.93 bcdef | 1.0 def |
| 0 | 0 | 5 | 6.10 abc | 2.89 bcdefg | 1.0 def |
Means with the same letter in each column are not significantly different at (p < 0.05) from each other according to DMRT analysis. BAP = 6-benzylaminopurine, kin = kinetin, and zea = zeatin.
Figure 1The effect of different concentrations of zeatin on growth of Labisia pumila var. alata compared to the control after 6 weeks of culture. (A) Stunted growth (4 mg/L zeatin), (B) healthy growth (2 mg/L zeatin), and (C) control treatment. Horizontal bar = 1 cm.
The effects of 2,4-D and picloram at different concentrations on the callus induction percentage of leaf explants of Labisia pumila var. alata after 4 weeks of culture.
| Growth Regulators (mg/L) | Callus Induction Percentage (%) | Callus Score | Morphology, Texture | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,4-D | Picloram | |||
| 0 | 0 | NC | - | NC |
| 0.5 | 0 | 60 a | ++ | Greenish, compact |
| 1 | 0 | 6.7 c | ++ | Greenish, compact |
| 1.5 | 0 | 6.7 c | + | Friable, yellowish to greenish |
| 2 | 0 | NC | - | NC |
| 2.5 | 0 | NC | - | NC |
| 0 | 0.5 | 6.7 c | + | Friable, yellowish |
| 0 | 1 | 50 a | +++ | Friable, whitish |
| 0 | 1.5 | 30 b | ++ | Friable, whitish |
| 0 | 2 | 27 b | ++ | Friable, yellowish to whitish |
| 0 | 2.5 | 27 b | + | Friable, yellowish to whitish |
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at (p < 0.05) from each other according to DMRT analysis. NC = no callus, 2,4-D = 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, + = callus grown on one edge of leaf, ++ = callus grown on two edges of leaf, +++ = callus grown on three edges of leaf.
Figure 2Callus induction of Labisia pumila var. alata on MS medium with single concentration of 2,4-D and picloram after 4 weeks of culture. (A) 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D and (B) 1.0 mg/L picloram. Horizontal bar = 1 cm.
The effects of 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D and 0.25 mg/L different cytokinins on callus induction percentage of leaf explant of Labisia pumila var. alata after 4 weeks of culture.
| Growth Regulators (mg/L) | Callus Formation (%) | Callus Score | Morphology, Texture |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 2,4-D + 0.25 zeatin | 100 a | +++ | Compact, yellowish to greenish |
| 0.5 2,4-D + 0.25 kinetin | 73.4 ab | ++ | Friable, yellowish to greenish |
| 0.5 2,4-D + 0.25 BAP | 46.6 b | + | Friable, yellowish to greenish |
| 0.5 2,4-D + 0.25 TDZ | 6.6 c | + | Friable, whitish |
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at (p < 0.05) from each other according to DMRT analysis. BAP = 6-benzylaminopurine, TDZ = thidiazuron, + = callus grown on one edge of leaf, ++ = callus grown on two edges of leaf, +++ = callus grown on three edges of leaf.
Figure 3Callus induction of Labisia pumila var. alata on MS medium with combination of 2,4-D and cytokinins after 4 weeks of culture. (A) 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D + 0.25 mg/L zeatin and (B) 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D + 0.25 mg/L kinetin. Horizontal bar = 1 cm.
The effects of 1.0 mg/L picloram and 0.5 mg/L different cytokinins on callus induction percentage of leaf explant of Labisia pumila var. alata after 4 weeks of culture.
| Growth Regulators (Mg/L) | Callus Formation Percentage (%) | Callus Score | Morphology, Texture |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 picloram + 0.5 zeatin | 33.4 ab | + | Greenish, compact |
| 1.0 picloram + 0.5 kinetin | 80 a | +++ | Whitish, friable |
| 1.0 picloram + 0.5 BAP | 66.6 ab | ++ | Whitish, compact |
| 1.0 picloram + 0.5 TDZ | 20 b | + | Whitish to dark brown, compact |
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at (p < 0.05) from each other according to DMRT analysis. BAP = 6-benzylaminopurine, TDZ = thidiazuron, + = callus grown on one edge of leaf, ++ = callus grown on two edges of leaf, +++ = callus grown on three edges of leaf.
Figure 4Callus induction of Labisia pumila var. alata on MS medium with the combination of picloram and cytokinins after 4 weeks of culture. (A) 1.0 mg/L picloram + 0.5 mg/L kinetin and (B) 1.0 mg/L picloram + 0.5 mg/L BAP. Horizontal bar = 1 cm.
Total phenolic and flavonoid content of different samples of Labisia pumila var. alata aqueous extract.
| Source of Sample | Total Phenolic Content | Total Flavonoid Content |
|---|---|---|
| Wild leaves | 1.01 ± 0.07 c | 1.67 ± 0.02 c |
| In vitro plantlets | 1.4 ± 0.07 b | 1.41 ± 0.68 b |
| Callus | 1.9 ± 0.14 a | 2.38 ± 0.18 a |
Means with the same letter in each column are not significantly different at (p < 0.05) from each other according to DMRT analysis. GAE = gallic acid equivalent, QE = quercetin equivalent.
Total antioxidant activities using DPPH and FRAP methods of different samples of Labisia pumila var. alata aqueous extract.
| Total Antioxidant Content (mg TE/g DW) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Source of Sample | DPPH | FRAP |
| Wild plant | 40.45 ± 2.69 c | 81 ± 5.39 c |
| In vitro plantlet | 57.47 ± 2.63 b | 115 ± 5.25 b |
| Callus | 75.88 ± 5.80 a | 152 ± 11.59 a |
Means with the same letter in each column are not significantly different at (p < 0.05) from each other according to DMRT analysis. DPPH = 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant potential.
Figure 5Correlation (R2) between antioxidant activities using FRAP and DPPH methods in leaf extract of wild plant, in vitro plantlet, and callus of Labisia pumila var. alata. DPPH = 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant potential.
Pearson correlation of polyphenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of different samples of Labisia pumila var. alata.
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| TPC | 1 | |||
|
| TFC | 0.86 * | 1 | ||
|
| DPPH | 0.81 * | 0.91 * | 1 | |
|
| FRAP | 0.98 * | 0.91 * | 0.86 * | 1 |
* is significantly affected at p < 0.05. TPC = total phenolic content, TFC = total flavonoid content, DPPH = 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant potential.