Literature DB >> 20038479

Is robotic mitral valve repair a reproducible approach?

Wen Cheng1, Gregory P Fontana, Michele A De Robertis, James Mirocha, Lawrence S C Czer, Robert M Kass, Alfredo Trento.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to review the surgical outcomes of our initial 120 robotic mitral valve repairs from June 2005 through April 2009.
METHODS: The initial 74 repairs were performed with the first-generation da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunny Vale, Calif), and the last 46 were performed with the da Vinci Si HD model. All patients received an annuloplasty band and 1 or more of the following: leaflet resection; annuloplasty; basal chord transposition, polytetrafluoroethylene neochordal replacement, or both; and edge-to-edge repair.
RESULTS: The overall mean age was 58.4 +/- 10.5 years, and 64% were male. There was 1 (0.8%) hospital mortality. Five patients required mitral valve replacement for a failed repair. Another patient had mitral valve rerepair on postoperative day 2. Except for 2 early reoperations for postoperative bleeding, all of the complications and failed repairs requiring operative revision occurred with the original robot. Postdischarge transthoracic echocardiographic follow-up was available on 107 (93%) of 115 patients, with a median follow-up of 321 days. None to mild mitral regurgitation was seen in 102 (89%) patients, moderate mitral regurgitation was seen in 9 (8.4%) patients, and severe mitral regurgitation was seen in 3 (2.8%), with 1 patient undergoing mitral valve replacement and 2 patients being medically managed.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of complications and all the repeat operations for failed mitral valve repair occurred with the older-model da Vinci robot. The newer da Vinci Si HD system, with the addition of an adjustable left atrial roof retractor, improves mitral valve exposure, enhancing the surgeon's ability to repair and test the valve. We have progressed to successful repair of all types of degenerative mitral valve pathology and have found the approach reproducible. Copyright 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20038479     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  11 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Future perspectives in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Sreekumar Subramanian; Joerg Seeburger; Thilo Noack; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

3.  Robotic mitral valve repair for all categories of leaflet prolapse: improving patient appeal and advancing standard of care.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Harold M Burkhart; Kent H Rehfeldt; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Richard C Daly; Eric E Williamson; Zhuo Li; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Robotically assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Kaushik Mandal; Hazaim Alwair; Wiley L Nifong; W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic repair of the mitral valve.

Authors:  Alfredo Trento
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  Complex robotic correction for complex degenerative mitral valve disease.

Authors:  Danny Ramzy; Joshua Chung; Wen Cheng; Michele A De Robertis; James Mirocha; Alfredo Trento
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-01

Review 7.  Robotic mitral valve surgery: overview, methodology, results, and perspective.

Authors:  W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

Review 8.  Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: best practice revolution.

Authors:  David H Adams; Raphael Rosenhek; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  Systematic review of robotic minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Michael Seco; Christopher Cao; Paul Modi; Paul G Bannon; Michael K Wilson; Michael P Vallely; Kevin Phan; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich Mohr; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

10.  The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Saeed Tarabichi; Hirohisa Ikegami; Mark J Russo; Leonard Y Lee; Anthony Lemaire
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.