Literature DB >> 19379969

Recovery of left ventricular function after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse.

Rakesh M Suri1, Hartzell V Schaff, Joseph A Dearani, Thoralf M Sundt, Richard C Daly, Charles J Mullany, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Thomas A Orszulak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recovery of ventricular function after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation is often incomplete. We studied clinical and echocardiographic factors influencing return of normal left ventricular ejection fraction after mitral valve repair or replacement for mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse.
METHODS: We evaluated 1063 patients who had mitral valve repair or replacement between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2000. A total of 2488 echocardiograms with follow-up ejection fractions were available for analysis.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 761 were men, 924 had valve repair, and 85% underwent surgery during the study's second decade. Compared with patients who had the operation in the 1980s, patients who had surgery in the 1990s had significantly smaller preoperative left heart dimensions and a 2.4-fold greater likelihood of an ejection fraction more than 60% during follow-up. Factors independently associated with higher ejection fraction at follow-up included valve repair (vs replacement), freedom from preoperative myocardial infarction, operation in the 1990s, greater preoperative ejection fraction, and smaller left ventricular dimensions. Patients with an ejection fraction of less than 50% at discharge were 3.5-fold less likely to recover normal ejection fraction during long-term follow-up (P < .001). Patients had a greater likelihood of a follow-up ejection fraction more than 60% if preoperative ejection fraction was more than 65% (hazard ratio, 1.7) or left ventricular end-systolic dimension was less than 36 mm (hazard ratio, 2.0).
CONCLUSION: Early repair of mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse, before deterioration in left heart size or function, increases the likelihood of subsequent normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19379969     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  21 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Quantitation of mitral regurgitation after percutaneous MitraClip repair: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian Hamilton-Craig; Wendy Strugnell; Niranjan Gaikwad; Matthew Ischenko; Vicki Speranza; Jonathan Chan; Johanne Neill; David Platts; Gregory M Scalia; Darryl J Burstow; Darren L Walters
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07

3.  Changes in left ventricular morphology and function after mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Alexis E Shafii; A Marc Gillinov; Tomislav Mihaljevic; William Stewart; Lillian H Batizy; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Robotic mitral valve repair for all categories of leaflet prolapse: improving patient appeal and advancing standard of care.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Harold M Burkhart; Kent H Rehfeldt; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Richard C Daly; Eric E Williamson; Zhuo Li; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Possible mechanism of late systolic mitral valve prolapse: systolic superior shift of leaflets secondary to annular dilatation that causes papillary muscle traction.

Authors:  Soshi Hei; Mai Iwataki; Jeong-Yoon Jang; Hiroshi Kuwaki; Keitaro Mahara; Shota Fukuda; Yun-Jeong Kim; Yosuke Nabeshima; Takeshi Onoue; Yasufumi Nagata; Shun Nishino; Nozomi Watanabe; Masaaki Takeuchi; Yosuke Nishimura; Jae-Kwan Song; Robert A Levine; Yutaka Otsuji
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  Surgical ventricular restoration: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Constantine L Athanasuleas; Gerald Buckberg
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 7.  Surgical ventricular restoration for the treatment of heart failure.

Authors:  Gerald Buckberg; Constantine Athanasuleas; John Conte
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Quantitative evaluation of change in coexistent mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  David J Kaczorowski; John W Macarthur; Jessica Howard; Dale Kobrin; Alex Fairman; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: best practice revolution.

Authors:  David H Adams; Raphael Rosenhek; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Valve repair to avoid prosthetic valve pathology: Mid-term results in mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Ahmet Yavuz Balcı; Ünsal Vural; Mehmet Kızılay; Cevdet Dönmez; Serdar Akansel; Fatih Özdemir; Rezan Aksoy; Günseli Abay
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 0.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.