Literature DB >> 21748341

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011.

Joyce C Harper1, Sioban B Sengupta.   

Abstract

For the last 20 years, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been mostly performed on cleavage stage embryos after the biopsy of 1-2 cells and PCR and FISH have been used for the diagnosis. The main indications have been single gene disorders and inherited chromosome abnormalities. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy is a technique that has used PGD technology to examine chromosomes in embryos from couples undergoing IVF with the aim of helping select the chromosomally 'best' embryo for transfer. It has been applied to patients of advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, repeated miscarriages and severe male factor infertility. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that PGS performed on cleavage stage embryos for a variety of indications does not improve delivery rates. At the cleavage stage, the cells biopsied from the embryo are often not representative of the rest of the embryo due to chromosomal mosaicism. There has therefore been a move towards blastocyst and polar body biopsy, depending on the indication and regulations in specific countries (in some countries, biopsy of embryos is not allowed). Blastocyst biopsy has an added advantage as vitrification of blastocysts, even post biopsy, has been shown to be a very successful method of cryopreserving embryos. However, mosaicism is also observed in blastocysts. There have been dramatic changes in the method of diagnosing small numbers of cells for PGD. Both array-comparative genomic hybridisation and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays have been introduced clinically for PGD and PGS. For PGD, the use of SNP arrays brings with it ethical concerns as a large amount of genetic information will be available from each embryo. For PGS, RCTs need to be conducted using both array-CGH and SNP arrays to determine if either will result in an increase in delivery rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21748341     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1056-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  98 in total

Review 1.  Evolving ethics in medically assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Guido Pennings; Guido de Wert
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Preconception and preimplantation diagnosis for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Y Verlinsky; S Rechitsky; S Evsikov; M White; J Cieslak; A Lifchez; J Valle; J Moise; C M Strom
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer.

Authors:  H Telenius; N P Carter; C E Bebb; M Nordenskjöld; B A Ponder; A Tunnacliffe
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma predisposition.

Authors:  Seema Dhanjal; Georgia Kakourou; Thalia Mamas; Natasha Saleh; Alpesh Doshi; Sarah Gotts; Sarah Nuttall; Karen Fordham; Paul Serhal; Joy Delhanty; Joyce Harper; Sioban Sengupta
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  William B Schoolcraft; Elpida Fragouli; John Stevens; Santiago Munne; Mandy G Katz-Jaffe; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the "good prognosis" patient.

Authors:  Liza R Meyer; Sigal Klipstein; William D Hazlett; Tricia Nasta; Patricia Mangan; Vishvanath C Karande
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  The use of whole genome amplification in the study of human disease.

Authors:  Simon Hughes; Nona Arneson; Susan Done; Jeremy Squire
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.667

8.  Assessment of numeric abnormalities of X, Y, 18, and 16 chromosomes in preimplantation human embryos before transfer.

Authors:  S Munné; K M Sultan; H U Weier; J A Grifo; J Cohen; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.

Authors:  D Pinkel; R Segraves; D Sudar; S Clark; I Poole; D Kowbel; C Collins; W L Kuo; C Chen; Y Zhai; S H Dairkee; B M Ljung; J W Gray; D G Albertson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH.

Authors:  Cedric Le Caignec; Claudia Spits; Karen Sermon; Martine De Rycke; Bernard Thienpont; Sophie Debrock; Catherine Staessen; Yves Moreau; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Andre Van Steirteghem; Inge Liebaers; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  42 in total

1.  SNP array-based copy number and genotype analyses for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human unbalanced translocations.

Authors:  Chris M J van Uum; Servi J C Stevens; Joseph C F M Dreesen; Marion Drüsedau; Hubert J Smeets; Bertien Hollanders-Crombach; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Joep P M Geraedts; John J M Engelen; Edith Coonen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Contributing factors for the incidence of aneuploidy in older patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  A review of, and commentary on, the ongoing second clinical introduction of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to routine IVF practice.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders.

Authors:  Ilan Tur-Kaspa; Roohi Jeelani; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an update on current technologies and ethical considerations.

Authors:  Kou Sueoka
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-14

Review 6.  Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF).

Authors:  Alex Simon; Neri Laufer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The number of biopsied trophectoderm cells may affect pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Luis Guzman; D Nuñez; R López; N Inoue; J Portella; F Vizcarra; L Noriega-Portella; L Noriega-Hoces; S Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Blastomere removal from cleavage-stage mouse embryos alters steroid metabolism during pregnancy.

Authors:  Atsushi Sugawara; Brittany Sato; Elise Bal; Abby C Collier; Monika A Ward
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 9.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 10.  Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Testing across the World: A Comparison of International Policy and Ethical Perspectives.

Authors:  Margaret E C Ginoza; Rosario Isasi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.