Literature DB >> 22644632

Contributing factors for the incidence of aneuploidy in older patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga1, Amanda S Setti, Rita de Cássia S Figueira, Assumpto Iaconelli, Edson Borges.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate different factors that might affect the incidence of embryo aneuploidy in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles (ICSI).
METHODS: One hundred and ninety ICSI cycles in conjunction with preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) were included. The influence of the following variables on the aneuploidy incidence was evaluated: (i) maternal and (ii) paternal ages, (iii) dose of FSH administered, (iv) dose of FSH per number of retrieved matured oocytes (FSH/MII), (v) serum 17β-oestradiol levels on the ovulation trigger day, (vi) aspirated follicles and (vii) retrieved oocytes.
RESULTS: A total of 440 embryos were successfully biopsied, of which 240 were considered euploid and 200 were considered aneuploid. The paternal age (Slope: 0.2, p = 0.372), total dose of FSH (Slope: 0.2, p = 0.218), FSH/MII (Slope: 0.1, p = 0.296) and 17β-oestradiol levels (Slope: 0.2, p = 0.378) were not correlated with the presence of aneuploidy. However, the maternal age (Slope: 1.7, p < 0.01), aspirated follicles (Slope: 1.9, p < 0.01) and retrieved oocytes (Slope: 2.6, p < 0.01) were negatively correlated with the incidence of aneuploidy.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in older patients, lower oocyte yields may represent a more appropriate response to ovarian stimulation, allowing the most competent follicles and oocytes to develop and thereby reducing the occurrence of embryo aneuploidy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644632      PMCID: PMC3463659          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-012-9795-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  36 in total

1.  The lack of influence of age on male fertility.

Authors:  R J Paulson; R C Milligan; R Z Sokol
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Clinical value of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; F Fiorentino; M Baldi; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Michèle Hansen; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Carol Bower; Sandra Webb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Sioban B Sengupta
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; A P Ferraretti; S Munné
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy.

Authors:  T Hassold; P Hunt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Reproductive functions of the ageing male.

Authors:  Bianca Kühnert; Eberhard Nieschlag
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Mireia Sandalinas; Tomas Escudero; Esther Velilla; Renee Walmsley; Sasha Sadowy; Jacques Cohen; David Sable
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Embryoscopic and cytogenetic analysis of 233 missed abortions: factors involved in the pathogenesis of developmental defects of early failed pregnancies.

Authors:  T Philipp; K Philipp; A Reiner; F Beer; D K Kalousek
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.

Authors:  Femke P Hohmann; Nicholas S Macklon; Bart C J M Fauser
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  4 in total

1.  The cumulative dose of gonadotropins used for controlled ovarian stimulation does not influence the odds of embryonic aneuploidy in patients with normal ovarian response.

Authors:  Lucky Sekhon; Kathryn Shaia; Anthony Santistevan; Karen Hunter Cohn; Joseph A Lee; Piraye Yurttas Beim; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The predictive value of serum concentrations of anti-Müllerian hormone for oocyte quality, fertilization, and implantation.

Authors:  Edson Borges; Daniela P A F Braga; Amanda Setti; Rita de Cássia Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01

3.  FSH dose to stimulate different patient' ages: when less is more.

Authors:  Edson Borges; Bianca F Zanetti; Amanda S Setti; Daniela Paf Braga; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Analysis of the Number of Euploid Embryos in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles With Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol.

Authors:  Gang Li; Yifang Wu; Wenbin Niu; Jiawei Xu; Linli Hu; Hao Shi; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.555

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.