Literature DB >> 7726256

Assessment of numeric abnormalities of X, Y, 18, and 16 chromosomes in preimplantation human embryos before transfer.

S Munné1, K M Sultan, H U Weier, J A Grifo, J Cohen, Z Rosenwaks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the feasibility of ascertaining aneuploidy for chromosomes X, Y, 18, and 16 by use of multiple-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization in blastomeres from preimplantation human embryos. STUDY
DESIGN: A short fluorescence in situ hybridization procedure involving the simultaneous use of four deoxyribonucleic acid probes detected with red, green, blue, or a mixture of red and green fluorochromes was developed to determine numeric abnormalities of chromosomes X, Y, 18, and 16. Embryos underwent biopsy, and all or most cells were analyzed to distinguish true aneuploidy from mosaicism and to assess technique variations within the same embryo (n = 64).
RESULTS: The analysis of all the blastomeres of an embryo was achieved in 91% of the embryos. Successful analyses including biopsy, fixation, and fluorescence in situ hybridization were achieved in 87.8% of the blastomeres. Of the four chromosomes tested, numeric aberrations were found in 23% and 42% of normally and abnormally developing embryos, respectively, including aneuploidy, polyploidy, haploidy, and mosaicism. When diploid embryos containing one or several tetraploid cells are counted as chromosomally abnormal, then 49% and 61% of normally and abnormally developing embryos, respectively, were chromosomally abnormal. Aneuploid embryos consisted of two monosomies for chromosome 16, one for chromosome 18, and a trisomy for chromosome 16. There was a tendency for aneuploidy to increase with maternal age.
CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization is a more efficient method than cytogenetic analysis to study specific aneuploidies at preimplantation stages of development in human embryos. In addition, the preimplantation genetic diagnosis of two blastomeres per eight-cell embryo may be sufficient to ensure successful analysis of polyploidy, haploidy, and specific aneuploidies without endangering the survival of the embryo. The technique can be easily modified to consider other chromosomes, including 13 and 21. Because most chromosomally abnormal embryos do not develop to term, the use of this technique may increase the delivery rate per embryo by allowing only transfer of embryos normal for the tested chromosomes. This technique would be most useful for older women undergoing in vitro fertilization, because aneuploidy appears to increase with advancing maternal age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7726256     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91479-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  25 in total

1.  Ethical considerations on indications for gender selection in Japan.

Authors:  Takahide Mori; Hirohiko Watanabe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Unequal pronuclear size--a powerful predictor of embryonic chromosome anomalies.

Authors:  D Manor; A Drugan; D Stein; M Pillar; J Itskovitz-Eldor
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Preimplantation diagnosis of inherited disease by embryo biopsy: an update of the world figures.

Authors:  J C Harper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Simultaneous detection of chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, and 21 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in blastomeres obtained from preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  S E Smith; A A Toledo; J B Massey; H I Kort
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Sioban B Sengupta
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Improving the fixation method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis by fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Authors:  K Xu; T Huang; T Liu; Z Shi; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass.

Authors:  D S Johnson; C Cinnioglu; R Ross; A Filby; G Gemelos; M Hill; A Ryan; D Smotrich; M Rabinowitz; M J Murray
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency by simultaneous analysis of duplex-nested PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a case report.

Authors:  Hyoung-Song Lee; Jin Hyun Jun; Hye Won Choi; Chun Kyu Lim; Han-Wook Yoo; Mi Kyoung Koong; Inn Soo Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.