PURPOSE: Microneedles are being developed to administer vaccines and therapeutics to and through skin. To date there has been no qualitative or quantitative research into public and health professionals' views on this new delivery technique. METHODS: Focus groups (n=7) comprising public and healthcare professionals were convened to capture the perceived advantages for, and concerns with, microneedles. Discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcript analysis identified themes that were explored using a questionnaire identifying consensus or otherwise. RESULTS: Participants identified many potential benefits of the microneedle delivery system, including reduced pain, tissue damage and risk of transmitting infections compared with conventional injections, as well as potential for self-administration (subject to safeguards such as an indicator to confirm dose delivery). Delayed onset, cost, accurate and reliable dosing and the potential for misuse were raised as concerns. A range of potential clinical applications was suggested. The public (100%) and professional (74%) participants were positive overall about microneedle technology. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory research study captured the views of the eventual end-users of microneedle technology. Microneedle researchers should now reflect on their research and development activities in the context of stakeholder engagement in order to facilitate the transfer of this new technology 'from bench to bedside.'
PURPOSE: Microneedles are being developed to administer vaccines and therapeutics to and through skin. To date there has been no qualitative or quantitative research into public and health professionals' views on this new delivery technique. METHODS: Focus groups (n=7) comprising public and healthcare professionals were convened to capture the perceived advantages for, and concerns with, microneedles. Discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcript analysis identified themes that were explored using a questionnaire identifying consensus or otherwise. RESULTS:Participants identified many potential benefits of the microneedle delivery system, including reduced pain, tissue damage and risk of transmitting infections compared with conventional injections, as well as potential for self-administration (subject to safeguards such as an indicator to confirm dose delivery). Delayed onset, cost, accurate and reliable dosing and the potential for misuse were raised as concerns. A range of potential clinical applications was suggested. The public (100%) and professional (74%) participants were positive overall about microneedle technology. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory research study captured the views of the eventual end-users of microneedle technology. Microneedle researchers should now reflect on their research and development activities in the context of stakeholder engagement in order to facilitate the transfer of this new technology 'from bench to bedside.'
Authors: Devin V McAllister; Ping M Wang; Shawn P Davis; Jung-Hwan Park; Paul J Canatella; Mark G Allen; Mark R Prausnitz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michel Cormier; Bonny Johnson; Mahmoud Ameri; Kofi Nyam; Luz Libiran; Dee Dee Zhang; Pete Daddona Journal: J Control Release Date: 2004-07-07 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Bao-Zhong Wang; Harvinder S Gill; Cheng He; Changbo Ou; Li Wang; Ying-Chun Wang; Hao Feng; Han Zhang; Mark R Prausnitz; Richard W Compans Journal: J Control Release Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: James J Norman; Seong-O Choi; Nhien T Tong; Avishek R Aiyar; Samirkumar R Patel; Mark R Prausnitz; Mark G Allen Journal: Biomed Microdevices Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.838
Authors: Ryan F Donnelly; Kurtis Moffatt; Ahlam Zaid Alkilani; Eva M Vicente-Pérez; Johanne Barry; Maelíosa T C McCrudden; A David Woolfson Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 4.200