Literature DB >> 21741440

Saccade adaptation improves in response to a gradually introduced stimulus perturbation.

Aaron L Wong1, Mark Shelhamer.   

Abstract

A major goal in the study of motor learning is to improve the extent to which subjects adapt their movements in response to errors. Recent attention has focused on the gradual-adaptation paradigm, in which an adaptive stimulus is introduced incrementally, rather than all at once as in conventional adaptation paradigms. However, there is disagreement - even among studies involving the same sensorimotor-learning task - as to the robustness of this approach. In particular, although all studies confirm that retention of learning is improved, not all agree that exposure to a gradual-adaptation paradigm can improve the extent of adaptation that takes place. Also, the paradigm has not previously been studied with saccadic eye movements, which are unique in that they typically lack online error feedback during each movement. To determine the effectiveness of gradual adaptation in this system, we compared saccadic adaptation performed with gradual and conventional adaptation paradigms. We find evidence consistent with more robust adaptation - in the sense of greater extent of adaptation as well as greater retention of learning (larger aftereffects) - in response to a gradual adaptation stimulus. The results suggest the need to develop alternative models of motor learning, as current error-based modeling efforts are unable to account for the increased extent of adaptation when subjects are only exposed to the full adaptive stimulus for a brief time.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741440      PMCID: PMC3144299          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  12 in total

1.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD.

Authors:  D A ROBINSON
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Enhancing visuomotor adaptation by reducing error signals: single-step (aware) versus multiple-step (unaware) exposure to wedge prisms.

Authors:  Carine Michel; Laure Pisella; Claude Prablanc; Gilles Rode; Yves Rossetti
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Obligatory adaptation of saccade gains.

Authors:  Riju Srimal; Jörn Diedrichsen; Edward B Ryklin; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm?

Authors:  JoAnn Kluzik; Jörn Diedrichsen; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions.

Authors:  F A Kagerer; J L Contreras-Vidal; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations.

Authors:  Jessica Klassen; Christine Tong; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Amy J Bastian; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Incremental angular vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation to active head rotation.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Charles C Della Santina; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Saccadic gain modification: visual error drives motor adaptation.

Authors:  J Wallman; A F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  19 in total

1.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Formation of model-free motor memories during motor adaptation depends on perturbation schedule.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Perturbation schedule does not alter retention of a locomotor adaptation across days.

Authors:  Sara J Hussain; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Saccadic adaptation to a systematically varying disturbance.

Authors:  Carlos R Cassanello; Sven Ohl; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Dissociating effects of error size, training duration, and amount of adaptation on the ability to retain motor memories.

Authors:  Laith Alhussein; Eghbal A Hosseini; Katrina P Nguyen; Maurice A Smith; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Did We Get Sensorimotor Adaptation Wrong? Implicit Adaptation as Direct Policy Updating Rather than Forward-Model-Based Learning.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; John W Krakauer; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Authors:  Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A long-memory model of motor learning in the saccadic system: a regime-switching approach.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Cerebellar motor learning: are environment dynamics more important than error size?

Authors:  Tricia L Gibo; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Allison M Okamura; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Saccade adaptation as a model of flexible and general motor learning.

Authors:  James P Herman; Annabelle Blangero; Laurent Madelain; Afsheen Khan; Mark R Harwood
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.467

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.