Literature DB >> 23064820

A long-memory model of motor learning in the saccadic system: a regime-switching approach.

Aaron L Wong1, Mark Shelhamer.   

Abstract

Maintenance of movement accuracy relies on motor learning, by which prior errors guide future behavior. One aspect of this learning process involves the accurate generation of predictions of movement outcome. These predictions can, for example, drive anticipatory movements during a predictive-saccade task. Predictive saccades are rapid eye movements made to anticipated future targets based on error information from prior movements. This predictive process exhibits long-memory (fractal) behavior, as suggested by inter-trial fluctuations. Here, we model this learning process using a regime-switching approach, which avoids the computational complexities associated with true long-memory processes. The resulting model demonstrates two fundamental characteristics. First, long-memory behavior can be mimicked by a system possessing no true long-term memory, producing model outputs consistent with human-subjects performance. In contrast, the popular two-state model, which is frequently used in motor learning, cannot replicate these findings. Second, our model suggests that apparent long-term memory arises from the trade-off between correcting for the most recent movement error and maintaining consistent long-term behavior. Thus, the model surprisingly predicts that stronger long-memory behavior correlates to faster learning during adaptation (in which systematic errors drive large behavioral changes); greater apparent long-term memory indicates more effective incorporation of error from the cumulative history across trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23064820      PMCID: PMC3568455          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0669-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  21 in total

1.  Noise, information transmission, and force variability.

Authors:  A B Slifkin; K M Newell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Variability and Determinism in Motor Behavior

Authors:  Michael A Riley; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Estimation and interpretation of 1/falpha noise in human cognition.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Simon Farrell; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

4.  Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Sen Cheng; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Obligatory adaptation of saccade gains.

Authors:  Riju Srimal; Jörn Diedrichsen; Edward B Ryklin; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient.

Authors:  Eric Zarahn; Gregory D Weston; Johnny Liang; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection?

Authors:  Nicholas Stergiou; Leslie M Decker
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Sensorimotor adaptation error signals are derived from realistic predictions of movement outcomes.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait.

Authors:  J M Hausdorff; C K Peng; Z Ladin; J Y Wei; A L Goldberger
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1995-01

10.  Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Ali Ghazizadeh; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  1 in total

1.  Nonlinear analysis of saccade speed fluctuations during combined action and perception tasks.

Authors:  C Stan; C Astefanoaei; E Pretegiani; L Optican; D Creanga; A Rufa; C P Cristescu
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.