Literature DB >> 27098027

Saccadic adaptation to a systematically varying disturbance.

Carlos R Cassanello1, Sven Ohl2, Martin Rolfs2.   

Abstract

Saccadic adaptation maintains the correct mapping between eye movements and their targets, yet the dynamics of saccadic gain changes in the presence of systematically varying disturbances has not been extensively studied. Here we assessed changes in the gain of saccade amplitudes induced by continuous and periodic postsaccadic visual feedback. Observers made saccades following a sequence of target steps either along the horizontal meridian (Two-way adaptation) or with unconstrained saccade directions (Global adaptation). An intrasaccadic step-following a sinusoidal variation as a function of the trial number (with 3 different frequencies tested in separate blocks)-consistently displaced the target along its vector. The oculomotor system responded to the resulting feedback error by modifying saccade amplitudes in a periodic fashion with similar frequency of variation but lagging the disturbance by a few tens of trials. This periodic response was superimposed on a drift toward stronger hypometria with similar asymptotes and decay rates across stimulus conditions. The magnitude of the periodic response decreased with increasing frequency and was smaller and more delayed for Global than Two-way adaptation. These results suggest that-in addition to the well-characterized return-to-baseline response observed in protocols using constant visual feedback-the oculomotor system attempts to minimize the feedback error by integrating its variation across trials. This process resembles a convolution with an internal response function, whose structure would be determined by coefficients of the learning model. Our protocol reveals this fast learning process in single short experimental sessions, qualifying it for the study of sensorimotor learning in health and disease.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  delta rule; oculomotor plasticity; parameter estimation; response function; sensorimotor learning; state equation; visually guided saccades

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098027      PMCID: PMC4969390          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00206.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  71 in total

1.  Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B Bridgeman; D Hendry; L Stark
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Adaptive modification of saccade size produces correlated changes in the discharges of fastigial nucleus neurons.

Authors:  Charles A Scudder; David M McGee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spontaneous recovery of motor memory during saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Vincent Ethier; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Obligatory adaptation of saccade gains.

Authors:  Riju Srimal; Jörn Diedrichsen; Edward B Ryklin; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Trade-off between spatiotopy and saccadic plasticity.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Similarities in error processing establish a link between saccade prediction at baseline and adaptation performance.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Visuomotor adaptation: how forgetting keeps us conservative.

Authors:  Katinka van der Kooij; Eli Brenner; Robert J van Beers; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Perceptual learning while preparing saccades.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Nicholas Murray-Smith; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Disrupted Corollary Discharge in Schizophrenia: Evidence From the Oculomotor System.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-04-02

3.  Contextual saccade adaptation induced by sequential saccades.

Authors:  Reza Azadi; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.974

4.  Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Authors:  Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A comparison of the temporal and spatial properties of trans-saccadic perceptual recalibration and saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Carlos Cassanello; Arvid Herwig; Martin Rolfs; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A generative learning model for saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Carlos R Cassanello; Florian Ostendorf; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Matteo Valsecchi; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.