Literature DB >> 21739322

All-polyethylene tibial components in obese patients are associated with low failure at midterm followup.

David F Dalury1, Kimberly K Tucker, Todd C Kelley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the obese population has increased markedly over the last four decades, and this trend continues. High patient weight places additional stress on TKA components, which may lead to increased polyethylene wear, osteolysis, radiolucencies, and clinical failure. Metal-backed tibial components and all-polyethylene tibial components in the general population have comparable osteolysis and failure, but it is unclear whether these components yield similar osteolysis and failure in obese patients. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined the (1) function, (2) occurrence of osteolysis, and (3) complications in a cohort of obese patients receiving all-polyethylene tibial components. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 17, 1996, and December 19, 2002, we implanted all-polyethylene tibial components in 90 obese patients (125 knees); 24 patients (33 knees) died and 13 patients (17 knees) were lost to followup, leaving 53 patients (59%) with 75 knees. All surgeries were cruciate-retaining, tricompartmental TKAs. We evaluated patients with Knee Society Scores and serial radiographs. Minimum followup was 7 years (mean, 10.4 years; range, 7-14 years).
RESULTS: At latest followup, mean Knee Society Score was 92 points. There were five tibial radiolucencies, all less than 1 mm and characterized as nonprogressive. We observed minimal, nonprogressive osteolysis in one knee. One patient required reoperation after a traumatic event. There were no implant-related failures and no implants at risk of failure.
CONCLUSIONS: At an average 10-year followup, all-polyethylene tibial components were functioning well in this obese group. These findings confirm the effectiveness of all-polyethylene tibial components in obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21739322      PMCID: PMC3238008          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1964-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  49 in total

1.  Radiographic assessment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C M Bach; I E Steingruber; S Peer; M Nogler; C Wimmer; M Ogon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Defining the relationship between obesity and total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Stickles; L Phillips; W T Brox; B Owens; W L Lanzer
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-03

3.  Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: executive summary. Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight in Adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Cemented all polyethylene tibial components in patients age 75 years and older.

Authors:  M W Pagnano; B A Levy; D J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Knee osteoarthritis and obesity.

Authors:  D Coggon; I Reading; P Croft; M McLaren; D Barrett; C Cooper
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-05

6.  Body mass index as a predictor of outcome in total knee replacement.

Authors:  D D Spicer; D L Pomeroy; W E Badenhausen; L A Schaper; J I Curry; K E Suthers; M W Smith
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Matched-pair analysis of all-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components.

Authors:  P Udomkiat; L D Dorr; W Long
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Results of all-polyethylene tibial components as a cost-saving technique.

Authors:  D L Pomeroy; L A Schaper; W E Badenhausen; K E Suthers; M W Smith; J A Empson; J I Curry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A randomized comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components.

Authors:  T J Gioe; K R Bowman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The outcome of total knee arthroplasty in obese patients.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Michael A Mont; Gracia Etienne; Lynne C Jones; David S Hungerford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Klaas Auke Nouta; Wiebe C Verra; Bart G Pijls; Jan W Schoones; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Bariatric orthopaedics: total knee arthroplasty in super-obese patients (BMI > 50 kg/m2). Survivorship and complications.

Authors:  Qais Naziri; Kimona Issa; Arthur L Malkani; Peter M Bonutti; Steven F Harwin; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Obesity has no effect on outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes F Plate; Marco A Augart; Thorsten M Seyler; Daniel N Bracey; Aneitra Hoggard; Michael Akbar; Riyaz H Jinnah; Gary G Poehling
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Influence of body mass index (BMI) on functional improvements at 3 years following total knee replacement: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Karthikeyan Muthumayandi; Craig Gerrand; Benjamin Kleim; Karen Bettinson; David Deehan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.