Literature DB >> 11064980

A randomized comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components.

T J Gioe1, K R Bowman.   

Abstract

Clinical failures of all-polyethylene tibial components in total knee arthroplasty generally have been failures of design, not materials. The current study was designed to compare a modern congruent all-polyethylene tibial component with a metal-backed tibial component with the same articular design and geometry. All patients older than 60 years of age requiring total knee arthroplasty were randomized prospectively to receive either a cemented posterior cruciate ligament-retaining all-polyethylene component or a metal-backed tibial component with identical articular surfaces. All patients received identical cemented femoral and all-polyethylene patellar implants. The mean age of the patients was 69 years, and the mean American Society of Anesthesiology score was 3. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 92% of this population. Three hundred twenty-four total knee arthroplasties in 296 patients were performed; 213 joints (111 all-polyethylene tibias and 102 metal-backed tibias) with a minimum of 3 years followup (mean, 49 months) are reported. The preoperative Knee Society knee score in the group of patients who received an all-polyethylene tibial component was 38 points, improving to 84 points at latest followup, whereas in the group of patients who received a metal-backed tibial component, the score improved from 35 to 85 points. Functional scores increased from preoperative values of 56 to 74 points in the patients who received all-polyethylene tibial components, and 57 to 72 points in the patients who received metal-backed tibial components. Range of motion measured at latest followup averaged 106 degrees in patients who received an all-polyethylene tibial component and 107 degrees in the patients who received a metal-backed component, and postoperative tibiofemoral alignment averaged 6 degrees valgus for both groups. There were 13 reoperations for instability, patellofemoral problems, or deep infection, but none for aseptic loosening or wear in either group. These differences were not statistically significant, nor were any measures of patient satisfaction or clinical outcome between the two groups in this period. Total knee arthroplasty with a well-designed, contemporary congruent all-polyethylene tibial component functions equivalently to its metal-backed tibial counterpart at 3- to 5-year followup in this patient population, and is less costly ($675).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11064980     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

Review 1.  Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Xiaoyun Pan; Tao Liu; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: 13-year survivorship of AGC total knee systems with average 7 years followup.

Authors:  Philip M Faris; E Michael Keating; Alex Farris; John B Meding; Merrill A Ritter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  All-polyethylene tibial components in obese patients are associated with low failure at midterm followup.

Authors:  David F Dalury; Kimberly K Tucker; Todd C Kelley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mauro Ciuffreda; Valerio D'Andrea; Nicholas Mannering; Joel Locher; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Survivorship comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty--Chinese experience.

Authors:  Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Pengde Kang; Liao Wang; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  All-polyethylene tibial components generate higher stress and micromotions than metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean Brihault; Alessandro Navacchia; Silvia Pianigiani; Luc Labey; Ronny De Corte; Valerio Pascale; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Guoyou Zhang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 8.  Cemented all-poly tibia in resource constrained country, affordable and cost-effective care. Is it applicable at this era? Review article.

Authors:  Vickash Kumar; Obada Hasan; Masood Umer; Naveed Baloch
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-09-27

9.  The Effects of Cyclic Loading and Motion on the Implant-Cement Interface and Cement Mantle of PEEK and Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Lennert de Ruiter; Raelene M Cowie; Louise M Jennings; Adam Briscoe; Dennis Janssen; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.