Literature DB >> 11064983

Results of all-polyethylene tibial components as a cost-saving technique.

D L Pomeroy1, L A Schaper, W E Badenhausen, K E Suthers, M W Smith, J A Empson, J I Curry.   

Abstract

Since 1992, the authors have used an all polyethylene tibial component in relatively less active patients older than 70 years of age who present for primary total knee replacement. Results of 312 knee replacements performed between March 1992 and March 1998 are presented in the hopes of showing this technique as a viable cost saving measure. Three hundred twelve primary total knee replacements were performed by the same group of surgeons. Fourteen patients died before the first year postoperative evaluation, leaving an index group of 298 knees in 231 patients. All components were evaluated using the radiographic and clinical parameters of the Knee Society. Hospital for Special Surgery scores also were calculated. All patients were given the Short Form-36 Quality of Life Assessment preoperatively and annually postoperatively. Clinical scores showed dramatic improvement. There have been three revisions (0.7%) but none were for aseptic loosening. Radiographic review revealed 295 replacements with optimum fixation. To date, no patient has osteolysis. The cost differential was significant. The use of this type of tibial component has, to date, afforded excellent clinical and radiographic results. Additional followup is needed to show the longevity of these results and to monitor wear or subsidence of these prostheses. Should these results continue to prove satisfactory in this particular group of patients with relatively low physical demands, significant cost savings may be realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11064983     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

Review 1.  Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Xiaoyun Pan; Tao Liu; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  All-polyethylene tibial components in obese patients are associated with low failure at midterm followup.

Authors:  David F Dalury; Kimberly K Tucker; Todd C Kelley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components are equivalent with BMI of less than 37.5.

Authors:  Jared Toman; Richard Iorio; William L Healy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mauro Ciuffreda; Valerio D'Andrea; Nicholas Mannering; Joel Locher; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Survivorship comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty--Chinese experience.

Authors:  Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Pengde Kang; Liao Wang; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Guoyou Zhang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  Cemented all-poly tibia in resource constrained country, affordable and cost-effective care. Is it applicable at this era? Review article.

Authors:  Vickash Kumar; Obada Hasan; Masood Umer; Naveed Baloch
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-09-27

8.  Limb-salvage treatment of en-block resected distal femoral tumors with endoprosthesis of all-polyethylene tibial component: a 9-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Fan Tang; Yong Zhou; Li Min; Wenli Zhang; Rui Shi; Yi Luo; Hong Duan; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.