Literature DB >> 20083321

Conserved expression without conserved regulatory sequence: the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Matthew T Weirauch1, Timothy R Hughes.   

Abstract

Regulatory regions with similar transcriptional output often have little overt sequence similarity, both within and between genomes. Although cis- and trans-regulatory changes can contribute to sequence divergence without dramatically altering gene expression outputs, heterologous DNA often functions similarly in organisms that share little regulatory sequence similarities (e.g. human DNA in fish), indicating that trans-regulatory mechanisms tend to diverge more slowly and can accommodate a variety of cis-regulatory configurations. This capacity to 'tinker' with regulatory DNA probably relates to the complexity, robustness and evolvability of regulatory systems, but cause-and-effect relationships among evolutionary processes and properties of regulatory systems remain a topic of debate. The challenge of understanding the concrete mechanisms underlying cis-regulatory evolution - including the conservation of function without the conservation of sequence - relates to the challenge of understanding the function of regulatory systems in general. Currently, we are largely unable to recognize functionally similar regulatory DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083321     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  89 in total

1.  Prediction of regulatory interactions from genome sequences using a biophysical model for the Arabidopsis LEAFY transcription factor.

Authors:  Edwige Moyroud; Eugenio Gómez Minguet; Felix Ott; Levi Yant; David Posé; Marie Monniaux; Sandrine Blanchet; Olivier Bastien; Emmanuel Thévenon; Detlef Weigel; Markus Schmid; François Parcy
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence.

Authors:  Patricia J Wittkopp; Gizem Kalay
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Evolution of conserved non-coding sequences within the vertebrate Hox clusters through the two-round whole genome duplications revealed by phylogenetic footprinting analysis.

Authors:  Masatoshi Matsunami; Kenta Sumiyama; Naruya Saitou
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Evolutionary Conservation and Diversification of Puf RNA Binding Proteins and Their mRNA Targets.

Authors:  Gregory J Hogan; Patrick O Brown; Daniel Herschlag
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 5.  Beyond the ENCODE project: using genomics and epigenomics strategies to study enhancer evolution.

Authors:  Noboru Jo Sakabe; Marcelo A Nobrega
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evolution of transcriptional enhancers and animal diversity.

Authors:  Marcelo Rubinstein; Flávio S J de Souza
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Hybrid incompatibility despite pleiotropic constraint in a sequence-based bioenergetic model of transcription factor binding.

Authors:  Alexander Y Tulchinsky; Norman A Johnson; Adam H Porter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Functional conservation of a forebrain enhancer from the elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii ) in zebrafish and mice.

Authors:  Ryan B MacDonald; Mélanie Debiais-Thibaud; Kyle Martin; Luc Poitras; Boon-Hui Tay; Byrappa Venkatesh; Marc Ekker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  An arthropod cis-regulatory element functioning in sensory organ precursor development dates back to the Cambrian.

Authors:  Savita Ayyar; Barbara Negre; Pat Simpson; Angelika Stollewerk
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Is transcription factor binding site turnover a sufficient explanation for cis-regulatory sequence divergence?

Authors:  Sandeep Venkataram; Justin C Fay
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.