Literature DB >> 21736457

Attention modulates maintenance of representations in visual short-term memory.

Bo-Cheng Kuo1, Mark G Stokes, Anna Christina Nobre.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that selective attention is of considerable importance for encoding task-relevant items into visual short-term memory (VSTM) according to our behavioral goals. However, it is not known whether top-down attentional biases can continue to operate during the maintenance period of VSTM. We used ERPs to investigate this question across two experiments. Specifically, we tested whether orienting attention to a given spatial location within a VSTM representation resulted in modulation of the contralateral delay activity (CDA), a lateralized ERP marker of VSTM maintenance generated when participants selectively encode memory items from one hemifield. In both experiments, retrospective cues during the maintenance period could predict a specific item (spatial retrocue) or multiple items (neutral retrocue) that would be probed at the end of the memory delay. Our results revealed that VSTM performance is significantly improved by orienting attention to the location of a task-relevant item. The behavioral benefit was accompanied by modulation of neural activity involved in VSTM maintenance. Spatial retrocues reduced the magnitude of the CDA, consistent with a reduction in memory load. Our results provide direct evidence that top-down control modulates neural activity associated with maintenance in VSTM, biasing competition in favor of the task-relevant information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21736457      PMCID: PMC3480577          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  57 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  Activity in fusiform face area modulated as a function of working memory load.

Authors:  T J Druzgal; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-01

4.  Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Tal Makovsik; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

5.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Top-down visual activity underlying VSTM and preparatory attention.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Andrew W McCollough; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short-term memory task.

Authors:  E K Miller; L Li; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Markers of preparatory attention predict visual short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Alexandra M Murray; Anna C Nobre; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  62 in total

1.  Toward the neural mechanisms of reduced working memory capacity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Carly J Leonard; Sam T Kaiser; Benjamin M Robinson; Emily S Kappenman; Britta Hahn; James M Gold; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 3.  Attention to memory: orienting attention to sound object representations.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-20

4.  Feature-based and object-based attention orientation during short-term memory maintenance.

Authors:  Yixuan Ku
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Dirk van Moorselaar; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

6.  Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; J Douglas Crawford; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

8.  Evidence for working memory storage operations in perceptual cortex.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Caterina Gratton; Jason Vytlacil; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.

Authors:  David De Vito; Anne E Ferrey; Mark J Fenske; Naseem Al-Aidroos
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.