Literature DB >> 26084908

Feature-based and object-based attention orientation during short-term memory maintenance.

Yixuan Ku1.   

Abstract

Top-down attention biases the short-term memory (STM) processing at multiple stages. Orienting attention during the maintenance period of STM by a retrospective cue (retro-cue) strengthens the representation of the cued item and improves the subsequent STM performance. In a recent article, Backer et al. (Backer KC, Binns MA, Alain C. J Neurosci 35: 1307-1318, 2015) extended these findings from the visual to the auditory domain and combined electroencephalography to dissociate neural mechanisms underlying feature-based and object-based attention orientation. Both event-related potentials and neural oscillations explained the behavioral benefits of retro-cues and favored the theory that feature-based and object-based attention orientation were independent.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  attention orientation; auditory attention; feature-based attention; object-based attention; retrospective cue

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26084908      PMCID: PMC4686297          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00342.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Orienting attention to sound object representations attenuates change deafness.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Neural dynamics underlying attentional orienting to auditory representations in short-term memory.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Malcolm A Binns; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels.

Authors:  André Moraes Bastos; Julien Vezoli; Conrado Arturo Bosman; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Robert Oostenveld; Jarrod Robert Dowdall; Peter De Weerd; Henry Kennedy; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory.

Authors:  Tobias Katus; Matthias M Müller; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.

Authors:  Laura Rerko; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Temporal coding organized by coupled alpha and gamma oscillations prioritize visual processing.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Bart Gips; Til Ole Bergmann; Mathilde Bonnefond
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 7.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Anticipatory alpha phase influences visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; James Z Chadick; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Alpha and gamma oscillations characterize feedback and feedforward processing in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  Timo van Kerkoerle; Matthew W Self; Bruno Dagnino; Marie-Alice Gariel-Mathis; Jasper Poort; Chris van der Togt; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Selective attention on representations in working memory: cognitive and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Yixuan Ku
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Retro-dimension-cue benefit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Chaoxiong Ye; Zhonghua Hu; Tapani Ristaniemi; Maria Gendron; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits.

Authors:  Chaoxiong Ye; Qianru Xu; Xinyang Liu; Piia Astikainen; Yongjie Zhu; Zhonghua Hu; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.