Literature DB >> 1287989

Blurring by fixational eye movements.

O Packer1, D R Williams.   

Abstract

A complete description of the loss of contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies requires an estimate of the role of eye movements, which could blur fine detail. We describe a new technique to isolate their effect. Observers viewed either a 100 c/deg interference fringe, which the cone mosaic aliased to a low frequency zebra stripe, or an artificial zebra stripe. The real and artificial zebra stripes have similar spatial patterns, but differ in the temporal modulation produced by eye movements. Contrast threshold was measured as a function of duration for both stimuli flashed in the dark. The ratio of the contrast thresholds for the real and artificial zebra stripes with long durations, when eye movements could have a differential effect, is always within a factor of two or so of the ratio for 1 msec flashes, when eye movements are eliminated. These results support the view that eye movements are only a minor source of image degradation even at very high spatial frequencies, and provide no support for the view that they improve high resolution tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1287989     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90052-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Human stereopsis is not limited by the optics of the well-focused eye.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Geunyoung Yoon; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Temporal Coding of Visual Space.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Ehud Ahissar; David Burr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Temporal encoding of spatial information during active visual fixation.

Authors:  Xutao Kuang; Martina Poletti; Jonathan D Victor; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Control and Functions of Fixational Eye Movements.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Martina Poletti
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.422

5.  Motor-sensory convergence in object localization: a comparative study in rats and humans.

Authors:  Guy Horev; Avraham Saig; Per Magne Knutsen; Maciej Pietr; Chunxiu Yu; Ehud Ahissar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The unsteady eye: an information-processing stage, not a bug.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Spatial summation in the human fovea: Do normal optical aberrations and fixational eye movements have an effect?

Authors:  William S Tuten; Robert F Cooper; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Alfredo Dubra; Austin Roorda; Nicolas P Cottaris; David H Brainard; Jessica I W Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Seeing via Miniature Eye Movements: A Dynamic Hypothesis for Vision.

Authors:  Ehud Ahissar; Amos Arieli
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Perception as a closed-loop convergence process.

Authors:  Ehud Ahissar; Eldad Assa
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Motion adaptation improves acuity (but perceived size doesn't matter).

Authors:  Selassie Tagoh; Lisa M Hamm; Dietrich S Schwarzkopf; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.