Literature DB >> 20095526

Binding affinity prediction with property-encoded shape distribution signatures.

Sourav Das1, Michael P Krein, Curt M Breneman.   

Abstract

We report the use of the molecular signatures known as "property-encoded shape distributions" (PESD) together with standard support vector machine (SVM) techniques to produce validated models that can predict the binding affinity of a large number of protein ligand complexes. This "PESD-SVM" method uses PESD signatures that encode molecular shapes and property distributions on protein and ligand surfaces as features to build SVM models that require no subjective feature selection. A simple protocol was employed for tuning the SVM models during their development, and the results were compared to SFCscore, a regression-based method that was previously shown to perform better than 14 other scoring functions. Although the PESD-SVM method is based on only two surface property maps, the overall results were comparable. For most complexes with a dominant enthalpic contribution to binding (DeltaH/-TDeltaS > 3), a good correlation between true and predicted affinities was observed. Entropy and solvent were not considered in the present approach, and further improvement in accuracy would require accounting for these components rigorously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20095526      PMCID: PMC2846646          DOI: 10.1021/ci9004139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  52 in total

1.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking.

Authors:  Badry D Bursulaya; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Scoring functions--the first 100 years.

Authors:  Jeremy R H Tame
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Hierarchical PLS modeling for predicting the binding of a comprehensive set of structurally diverse protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Anton Lindström; Fredrik Pettersson; Fredrik Almqvist; Anders Berglund; Jan Kihlberg; Anna Linusson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Contribution of conformer focusing to the uncertainty in predicting free energies for protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  The importance of the domain of applicability in QSAR modeling.

Authors:  Shane Weaver; M Paul Gleeson
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.518

7.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Predicting the predictability: a unified approach to the applicability domain problem of QSAR models.

Authors:  Horvath Dragos; Marcou Gilles; Varnek Alexandre
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  On the interpretation and interpretability of quantitative structure-activity relationship models.

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  10 in total

1.  Robust scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions with quantum chemical charge models.

Authors:  Jui-Chih Wang; Jung-Hsin Lin; Chung-Ming Chen; Alex L Perryman; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Support vector regression scoring of receptor-ligand complexes for rank-ordering and virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Liwei Li; Bo Wang; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Using diverse potentials and scoring functions for the development of improved machine-learned models for protein-ligand affinity and docking pose prediction.

Authors:  Omar N A Demerdash
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review.

Authors:  Rocco Meli; Garrett M Morris; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Front Bioinform       Date:  2022-06-17

5.  Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Beihong Ji; Xibing He; Jingchen Zhai; Yuzhao Zhang; Viet Hoang Man; Junmei Wang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Hierarchical virtual screening for the discovery of new molecular scaffolds in antibacterial hit identification.

Authors:  Pedro J Ballester; Martina Mangold; Nigel I Howard; Richard L Marchese Robinson; Chris Abell; Jochen Blumberger; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Recent trends in artificial intelligence-driven identification and development of anti-neurodegenerative therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Kushagra Kashyap; Mohammad Imran Siddiqi
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.364

8.  Deep Learning in Drug Design: Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.

Authors:  Mohammad A Rezaei; Yanjun Li; Dapeng Wu; Xiaolin Li; Chenglong Li
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Does a more precise chemical description of protein-ligand complexes lead to more accurate prediction of binding affinity?

Authors:  Pedro J Ballester; Adrian Schreyer; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 10.  Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening.

Authors:  Qurrat Ul Ain; Antoniya Aleksandrova; Florian D Roessler; Pedro J Ballester
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2015-08-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.