Literature DB >> 27480696

Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015.

Inna Slynko1, Franck Da Silva1, Guillaume Bret1, Didier Rognan2.   

Abstract

High affinity ligands for a given target tend to share key molecular interactions with important anchoring amino acids and therefore often present quite conserved interaction patterns. This simple concept was formalized in a topological knowledge-based scoring function (GRIM) for selecting the most appropriate docking poses from previously X-rayed interaction patterns. GRIM first converts protein-ligand atomic coordinates (docking poses) into a simple 3D graph describing the corresponding interaction pattern. In a second step, proposed graphs are compared to that found from template structures in the Protein Data Bank. Last, all docking poses are rescored according to an empirical score (GRIMscore) accounting for overlap of maximum common subgraphs. Taking the opportunity of the public D3R Grand Challenge 2015, GRIM was used to rescore docking poses for 36 ligands (6 HSP90α inhibitors, 30 MAP4K4 inhibitors) prior to the release of the corresponding protein-ligand X-ray structures. When applied to the HSP90α dataset, for which many protein-ligand X-ray structures are already available, GRIM provided very high quality solutions (mean rmsd = 1.06 Å, n = 6) as top-ranked poses, and significantly outperformed a state-of-the-art scoring function. In the case of MAP4K4 inhibitors, for which preexisting 3D knowledge is scarce and chemical diversity is much larger, the accuracy of GRIM poses decays (mean rmsd = 3.18 Å, n = 30) although GRIM still outperforms an energy-based scoring function. GRIM rescoring appears to be quite robust with comparison to the other approaches competing for the same challenge (42 submissions for the HSP90 dataset, 27 for the MAP4K4 dataset) as it ranked 3rd and 2nd respectively, for the two investigated datasets. The rescoring method is quite simple to implement, independent on a docking engine, and applicable to any target for which at least one holo X-ray structure is available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D3R; Docking; Drug discovery data resource; Grand challenge

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27480696     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9930-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  44 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2003-01-28

3.  Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy.

Authors:  Esther Kellenberger; Jordi Rodrigo; Pascal Muller; Didier Rognan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-01

4.  Expanded interaction fingerprint method for analyzing ligand binding modes in docking and structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Matthew D Kelly; Ricardo L Mancera
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

5.  Knowledge-Based Strategy to Improve Ligand Pose Prediction Accuracy for Lead Optimization.

Authors:  Cen Gao; Nels Thorsteinson; Ian Watson; Jibo Wang; Michal Vieth
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  POSIT: Flexible Shape-Guided Docking For Pose Prediction.

Authors:  Brian P Kelley; Scott P Brown; Gregory L Warren; Steven W Muchmore
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Machine learning in computational docking.

Authors:  Mohamed A Khamis; Walid Gomaa; Walaa F Ahmed
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery.

Authors:  Bernd Kuhn; Paul Gerber; Tanja Schulz-Gasch; Martin Stahl
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Structure-based discovery of allosteric modulators of two related class B G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Chris de Graaf; Chantal Rein; David Piwnica; Fabrizio Giordanetto; Didier Rognan
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Estrogen receptor alpha as a key target of red wine polyphenols action on the endothelium.

Authors:  Matthieu Chalopin; Angela Tesse; Maria Carmen Martínez; Didier Rognan; Jean-François Arnal; Ramaroson Andriantsitohaina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  A benchmark driven guide to binding site comparison: An exhaustive evaluation using tailor-made data sets (ProSPECCTs).

Authors:  Christiane Ehrt; Tobias Brinkjost; Oliver Koch
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Macrocycle modeling in ICM: benchmarking and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Polo C-H Lam; Ruben Abagyan; Maxim Totrov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Ranking docking poses by graph matching of protein-ligand interactions: lessons learned from the D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Priscila da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes; Franck Da Silva; Guillaume Bret; Didier Rognan
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Getting Docking into Shape Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.

Authors:  Sami T Kurkinen; Sakari Lätti; Olli T Pentikäinen; Pekka A Postila
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Potential repurposing of four FDA approved compounds with antiplasmodial activity identified through proteome scale computational drug discovery and in vitro assay.

Authors:  Bakary N'tji Diallo; Tarryn Swart; Heinrich C Hoppe; Özlem Tastan Bishop; Kevin Lobb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  IChem: A Versatile Toolkit for Detecting, Comparing, and Predicting Protein-Ligand Interactions.

Authors:  Franck Da Silva; Jeremy Desaphy; Didier Rognan
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.466

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.