Literature DB >> 11713878

The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production.

A Caramazza1, A Costa, M Miozzo, Y Bi.   

Abstract

In a series of experiments, the authors investigated whether naming latencies for homophones (e.g., /nlambdan/) are a function of specific-word frequency (i.e., the frequency of nun) or a function of cumulative-homophone frequency (i.e., the sum of the frequencies of nun and none). Specific-word but not cumulative-homophone frequency affected picture-naming latencies. This result was obtained in 2 languages (English and Chinese). An analogous finding was obtained in a translation task, where bilingual speakers produced the English names of visually presented Spanish words. Control experiments ruled out that these results are an artifact of orthographic or articulatory factors, or of visual recognition. The results argue against the hypothesis that homophones share a common word-form representation, and support instead a model in which homophones have fully independent representations.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11713878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  29 in total

1.  Timed picture naming in seven languages.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Simona D'Amico; Thomas Jacobsen; Anna Székely; Elena Andonova; Antonella Devescovi; Dan Herron; Ching Ching Lu; Thomas Pechmann; Csaba Pléh; Nicole Wicha; Kara Federmeier; Irini Gerdjikova; Gabriel Gutierrez; Daisy Hung; Jeanne Hsu; Gowri Iyer; Katherine Kohnert; Teodora Mehotcheva; Araceli Orozco-Figueroa; Angela Tzeng; Ovid Tzeng
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

2.  What the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) says about homophone frequency inheritance.

Authors:  Inés Antón-Méndez; Carson T Schütze; Mary K Champion; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

3.  Characterizing the bilingual disadvantage in noun phrase production.

Authors:  Jasmin Sadat; Clara D Martin; F Xavier Alario; Albert Costa
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-06

4.  Planning in sentence production: evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope.

Authors:  Randi C Martin; Jason E Crowther; Meredith Knight; Franklin P Tamborello; Chin-Lung Yang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

5.  Differences between Chinese morphosyllabic and German alphabetic readers in the Stroop interference effect.

Authors:  Henrik Saalbach; Elsbeth Stern
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

6.  Frequency effects in compound production.

Authors:  Heidrun Bien; Willem J M Levelt; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Markus F Damian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

8.  More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis.

Authors:  Tamar H Gollan; Rosa I Montoya; Cynthia Cera; Tiffany C Sandoval
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Density pervades: an analysis of phonological neighbourhood density effects in aphasic speakers with different types of naming impairment.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The Separability of Morphological Processes from Semantic Meaning and Syntactic Class in Production of Single Words: Evidence from the Hebrew Root Morpheme.

Authors:  Avital Deutsch
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.