Literature DB >> 32372366

When phonological neighborhood density both facilitates and impedes: Age of acquisition and name agreement interact with phonological neighborhood during word production.

Hossein Karimi1, Michele Diaz2.   

Abstract

The number of similar-sounding words that a target word has, or its Phonological Neighborhood Density (PND), has been shown to influence word production. However, reported results are sometimes inconsistent, with studies showing facilitation, inhibition, and null effects of phonological neighbors. These mixed results may be due to the influence of other factors beyond PND. We investigated the potential interactions between a broad measure of PND (bPND), and age of acquisition (AoA), frequency, and name agreement in order to see if the effect of bPND varies as a function of these three variables. We examined the effect of bPND on the latency of picture naming and observed significant interactions between bPND and AoA such that bPND facilitated lexical retrieval for words that were acquired early, but inhibited retrieval for words acquired later in life. We hypothesize that lexical retrieval difficulty ultimately depends on the activation level of the target word's phonological representations relative to the activation levels of its neighbors' phonological representations. When phonological features of the target word are weakly activated (i.e., late AoA), and bPND is high, the neighbors' activation may overshadow the target's, impeding target retrieval. However, when the target's phonological representation is strongly activated, the activation of the neighbors might not exceed that of the target, thereby supporting phonological retrieval. We also observed interactions between bPND and name agreement such that increasing bPND led to faster reaction times (RTs), particularly when name agreement was lower, suggesting that bPND may also facilitate word retrieval when lexical competition is high.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age of acquisition; Frequency; Language production; Name agreement; Phonological Neighborhood Density

Year:  2020        PMID: 32372366      PMCID: PMC7787263          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01042-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  56 in total

1.  The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

2.  The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition.

Authors:  Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Mrs. Malaprop's Neighborhood: Using Word Errors to Reveal Neighborhood Structure.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Jocelyn R Folk; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Lexical neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition and production in healthy aging.

Authors:  Vanessa Taler; Geoffrey P Aaron; Lauren G Steinmetz; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Phonological neighborhood effect in spontaneous speech in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Pei-Tzu Tsai
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  First in, first out: word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency.

Authors:  G D Brown; F L Watson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

7.  Lexical and phonological organization in children: evidence from repetition tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Cyndie L Swenson; Shayla C Manthei
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Measuring visual clutter.

Authors:  Ruth Rosenholtz; Yuanzhen Li; Lisa Nakano
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Is the preference of natural versus man-made scenes driven by bottom-up processing of the visual features of nature?

Authors:  Omid Kardan; Emre Demiralp; Michael C Hout; MaryCarol R Hunter; Hossein Karimi; Taylor Hanayik; Grigori Yourganov; John Jonides; Marc G Berman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-23

10.  Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Janine Bayer; Matthias Gamer; Tina B Lonsdorf; Tobias Sommer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Neural sensitivity to phonological characteristics is stable across the lifespan.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Hossein Karimi; Sara B W Troutman; Victoria H Gertel; Abigail L Cosgrove; Haoyun Zhang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.