Literature DB >> 21701808

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre experience of 120 cases.

Daniel W Good1, James M O'Riordan, Diarmaid Moran, Frank B Keane, Emmanuel Eguare, Diarmuid S O'Riordain, Paul C Neary.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: For colorectal surgeons, laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery poses a new challenge. The defence of the questionable oncological safety tempered by the impracticality of the long learning curve is rapidly fading. As a unit specialising in minimally invasive surgery, we have routinely undertaken rectal cancer surgery laparoscopically since 2005.
METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer between June 2005 and February 2010 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients underwent surgery for rectal cancer during the study period. One hundred and twenty patients had a laparoscopic resection, six were converted to open (conversion rate 5%) and 10 had a planned primary open procedure. Fifty four were low rectal tumours and 76 were upper rectal tumours. One hundred and thirteen patients had an anterior resection (87%), 17 patients an abdomino-perineal resection (13%) and 62 of the 130 patients (47.6%) had neoadjuvant radiotherapy. The median lymph node retrieval rate was 12 (9-14), five patients (3.8%) had a positive circumferential margin and the clinical anastomotic leak rate was 3.8% (n = 5 patients). There was no significant difference in the stated parameters for neoadjuvant versus non-neoadjuvant patients and for upper versus lower rectal tumours. Ninety three percent of mesorectal excision specimens were complete on pathological assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: During the study period, 92% of rectal cancers underwent a laparoscopic resection with low rates of morbidity and acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. This data supports the view that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer can be safely delivered in mid-volume centres by surgeons who have completed the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21701808     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1261-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  32 in total

1.  Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  P P Bianchi; C Ceriani; A Locatelli; G Spinoglio; M G Zampino; A Sonzogni; C Crosta; B Andreoni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Capretti; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bogdan C Paun; Scott Cassie; Anthony R MacLean; Elijah Dixon; W Donald Buie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  F Bretagnol; B Lelong; C Laurent; V Moutardier; A Rullier; G Monges; J-R Delpero; E Rullier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  C C Compton; L P Fielding; L J Burgart; B Conley; H S Cooper; S R Hamilton; M E Hammond; D E Henson; R V Hutter; R B Nagle; M L Nielsen; D J Sargent; C R Taylor; M Welton; C Willett
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K C M J Peeters; R A E M Tollenaar; C A M Marijnen; E Klein Kranenbarg; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  Emad H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; Q Hernandez; A Sanchez; M D Frutos; P Parrilla
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  The RAPID protocol enhances patient recovery after both laparoscopic and open colorectal resections.

Authors:  G M Lloyd; R Kirby; D M Hemingway; F B Keane; A S Miller; P Neary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Jin-bo Jiang; Kun Jiang; Yong Dai; Ru-xia Wang; Wei-zhi Wu; Jing-jing Wang; Fu-Bo Xie; Xue-Mei Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Long-term outcomes and propensity score matching analysis: rectal cancer resection for patients with elevated preoperative risk.

Authors:  Hao Feng; Tobias S Schiergens; Zhi-Hai Mao; Jingkun Zhao; Xiaohui Shen; Ai-Guo Lu; Wolfgang E Thasler
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11

3.  The implementation of a standardized approach to laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Authors:  Katrine Kanstrup Aslak; Orhan Bulut
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.