Literature DB >> 20035353

The RAPID protocol enhances patient recovery after both laparoscopic and open colorectal resections.

G M Lloyd1, R Kirby, D M Hemingway, F B Keane, A S Miller, P Neary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs can accelerate recovery and shorten the hospital stay after colorectal resections. The RAPID (remove, ambulate, postoperative analgesia, introduce diet) protocol is a simplified ERAS program that consists of a simplified, user-friendly single-page pro forma schedule. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the RAPID protocol on patients undergoing both laparoscopic and open colorectal resections in two specialized colorectal units.
METHODS: A prospective, two-center study assessed 117 age-matched patients undergoing open or laparoscopic colorectal resection to compare the postoperative course for patients using the RAPID protocol with those treated in a traditional manner.
RESULTS: Of the 117 patients studied, 70 underwent laparoscopic resection (55 with the RAPID protocol) and 47 underwent open resection (25 with the RAPID protocol). Patients undergoing laparoscopic resections with the RAPID protocol had a significantly shorter hospital stay (p = 0.01) and tolerance of a full diet (p = 0.002). Similarly, patients undergoing open resections with the RAPID protocol also have a significantly shorter hospital stay (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: The RAPID protocol is a user-friendly, easy, and effective tool that facilitates earlier tolerance of diet and discharge from the hospital for patients undergoing laparoscopic or open colorectal resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20035353     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0795-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Future perspectives and research initiatives in fast-track surgery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Fast-track surgery may reduce complications following major colonic surgery.

Authors:  Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Andrew B Connolly; Lincoln H Israel; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; M K Y Chan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  'Fast track' postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  C P Delaney; V W Fazio; A J Senagore; B Robinson; A L Halverson; F H Remzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

8.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Implementation of a fast-track perioperative care program: what are the difficulties?

Authors:  Sebastiaan W Polle; Jan Wind; Jan W Fuhring; Jan Hofland; Dirk J Gouma; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 2.588

10.  A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy.

Authors:  M L Cheatham; W C Chapman; S P Key; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  16 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre experience of 120 cases.

Authors:  Daniel W Good; James M O'Riordan; Diarmaid Moran; Frank B Keane; Emmanuel Eguare; Diarmuid S O'Riordain; Paul C Neary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Epidural Analgesia Is Associated with Prolonged Length of Stay After Open HPB Surgery in Over 27,000 Patients.

Authors:  Lyonell B Kone; Vijay K Maker; Mihaela Banulescu; Ajay V Maker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  International survey among surgeons on the perioperative management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zaid Al-Difaie; Nariaki Okamoto; Max H M C Scheepers; Didier Mutter; Laurents P S Stassen; Nicole D Bouvy; Jacques Marescaux; Bernard Dallemagne; Michele Diana; Mahdi Al-Taher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 6.  Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement.

Authors:  Vijaya Gottumukkala; Thomas A Aloia; Ryan W Day; Sharon Fielder; John Calhoun; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Active and passive compliance in an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  Christopher C Thorn; Ian White; Jennie Burch; George Malietzis; Robin Kennedy; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  What factors are associated with increased risk for prolonged postoperative opioid usage after colorectal surgery?

Authors:  Caitlin Stafford; Todd Francone; Patricia L Roberts; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme.

Authors:  W R Spanjersberg; J D P van Sambeeck; A Bremers; C Rosman; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Overnight hospital stay after colon surgery for adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  James P Rogers; Andrew Dobradin; Pran M Kar; Shaan E Alam
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.