Literature DB >> 21701049

Calculation of shear stiffness in noise dominated magnetic resonance elastography data based on principal frequency estimation.

K P McGee1, D Lake, Y Mariappan, R D Hubmayr, A Manduca, K Ansell, R L Ehman.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a non-invasive phase-contrast-based method for quantifying the shear stiffness of biological tissues. Synchronous application of a shear wave source and motion encoding gradient waveforms within the MRE pulse sequence enable visualization of the propagating shear wave throughout the medium under investigation. Encoded shear wave-induced displacements are then processed to calculate the local shear stiffness of each voxel. An important consideration in local shear stiffness estimates is that the algorithms employed typically calculate shear stiffness using relatively high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) MRE images and have difficulties at an extremely low SNR. A new method of estimating shear stiffness based on the principal spatial frequency of the shear wave displacement map is presented. Finite element simulations were performed to assess the relative insensitivity of this approach to decreases in SNR. Additionally, ex vivo experiments were conducted on normal rat lungs to assess the robustness of this approach in low SNR biological tissue. Simulation and experimental results indicate that calculation of shear stiffness by the principal frequency method is less sensitive to extremely low SNR than previously reported MRE inversion methods but at the expense of loss of spatial information within the region of interest from which the principal frequency estimate is derived.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21701049      PMCID: PMC3144863          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  34 in total

1.  Visualization and quantification of breast cancer biomechanical properties with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  D B Plewes; J Bishop; A Samani; J Sciarretta
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Quantitative shear wave magnetic resonance elastography: comparison to a dynamic shear material test.

Authors:  Stacie I Ringleb; Qingshan Chen; David S Lake; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Determination and analysis of guided wave propagation using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  A J Romano; P B Abraham; P J Rossman; J A Bucaro; R L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Shear wave group velocity inversion in MR elastography of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Sebastian Papazoglou; Jens Rump; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain.

Authors:  Scott A Kruse; Gregory H Rose; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Joel P Felmlee; Clifford R Jack; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Elastic moduli of excised constricted rat lungs.

Authors:  F G Salerno; M S Ludwig
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-01

7.  MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Alexia L McKnight; Jennifer L Kugel; Phillip J Rossman; Armando Manduca; Lynn C Hartmann; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Effect of vascular volume and edema on wave propagation in canine lungs.

Authors:  M Jahed; S J Lai-Fook; P K Bhagat
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-05

9.  MR elastography as a method for the assessment of myocardial stiffness: comparison with an established pressure-volume model in a left ventricular model of the heart.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Kiaran P McGee; Philip A Araoz; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Anthony J Romano; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Lung parenchymal mechanics in health and disease.

Authors:  Débora S Faffe; Walter A Zin
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 37.312

View more
  13 in total

1.  A comprehensive computational model of sound transmission through the porcine lung.

Authors:  Zoujun Dai; Ying Peng; Brian M Henry; Hansen A Mansy; Richard H Sandler; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of Poroviscoelastic Models for Sound and Vibration in the Lungs.

Authors:  Zoujun Dai; Ying Peng; Hansen A Mansy; Richard H Sandler; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Vib Acoust       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 1.583

3.  Extension of the Optimized Virtual Fields Method to estimate viscoelastic material parameters from 3D dynamic displacement fields.

Authors:  N Connesson; E H Clayton; P V Bayly; F Pierron
Journal:  Strain       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  MR Elastography-derived Stiffness: A Biomarker for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Authors:  Benjamin A Walter; Prasath Mageswaran; Xiaokui Mo; Daniel J Boulter; Hazem Mashaly; Xuan V Nguyen; Luciano M Prevedello; William Thoman; Brian D Raterman; Prateek Kalra; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Including spatial information in nonlinear inversion MR elastography using soft prior regularization.

Authors:  Matthew McGarry; Curtis L Johnson; Bradley P Sutton; Elijah Ew Van Houten; John G Georgiadis; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Experimental and Computational Studies of Sound Transmission in a Branching Airway Network Embedded in a Compliant Viscoelastic Medium.

Authors:  Zoujun Dai; Ying Peng; Hansen A Mansy; Richard H Sandler; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Sound Vib       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.655

7.  Magnetic resonance elastography of brain: Comparison between anisotropic and isotropic stiffness and its correlation to age.

Authors:  Prateek Kalra; Brian Raterman; Xiaokui Mo; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Magnetic resonance assessment of parenchymal elasticity in normal and edematous, ventilator-injured lung.

Authors:  Kiaran P McGee; Yogesh K Mariappan; Rolf D Hubmayr; Rickey E Carter; Zhonghao Bao; David L Levin; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-06-07

9.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Intervertebral Discs: Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging Sequence Validation.

Authors:  Megan Co; Huiming Dong; Daniel J Boulter; Xuan V Nguyen; Safdar N Khan; Brian Raterman; Brett Klamer; Arunark Kolipaka; Benjamin A Walter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 5.119

10.  Reconstruction of elasticity: a stochastic model-based approach in ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Minhua Lu; Heye Zhang; Jun Wang; Jinwei Yuan; Zhenghui Hu; Huafeng Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.