Literature DB >> 26146416

Extension of the Optimized Virtual Fields Method to estimate viscoelastic material parameters from 3D dynamic displacement fields.

N Connesson1, E H Clayton2, P V Bayly2, F Pierron3.   

Abstract

In-vivo measurement of the mechanical properties of soft tissues is essential to provide necessary data in biomechanics and medicine (early cancer diagnosis, study of traumatic brain injuries, etc.). Imaging techniques such as Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) can provide 3D displacement maps in the bulk and in vivo, from which, using inverse methods, it is then possible to identify some mechanical parameters of the tissues (stiffness, damping etc.). The main difficulties in these inverse identification procedures consist in dealing with the pressure waves contained in the data and with the experimental noise perturbing the spatial derivatives required during the processing. The Optimized Virtual Fields Method (OVFM) [1], designed to be robust to noise, present natural and rigorous solution to deal with these problems. The OVFM has been adapted to identify material parameter maps from Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) data consisting of 3-dimensional displacement fields in harmonically loaded soft materials. In this work, the method has been developed to identify elastic and viscoelastic models. The OVFM sensitivity to spatial resolution and to noise has been studied by analyzing 3D analytically simulated displacement data. This study evaluates and describes the OVFM identification performances: different biases on the identified parameters are induced by the spatial resolution and experimental noise. The well-known identification problems in the case of quasi-incompressible materials also find a natural solution in the OVFM. Moreover, an a posteriori criterion to estimate the local identification quality is proposed. The identification results obtained on actual experiments are briefly presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR elastography; elasticity; elasticity reconstruction; inverse problem; noise robustness; noise sensitivity; optimized virtual fields; virtual fields method; viscoelasticity

Year:  2015        PMID: 26146416      PMCID: PMC4486339          DOI: 10.1111/str.12126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strain        ISSN: 0039-2103            Impact factor:   1.848


  21 in total

Review 1.  Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; S K Alam; B Garra; F Kallel; E Konofagou; T Krouskop; T Varghese
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Measurement of strain in physical models of brain injury: a method based on HARP analysis of tagged magnetic resonance images (MRI).

Authors:  P V Bayly; S Ji; S K Song; R J Okamoto; P Massouros; G M Genin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Anisotropic and hyperelastic identification of in vitro human arteries from full-field optical measurements.

Authors:  Stéphane Avril; Pierre Badel; Ambroise Duprey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain.

Authors:  Scott A Kruse; Gregory H Rose; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Joel P Felmlee; Clifford R Jack; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Theoretical limitations of the elastic wave equation inversion for tissue elastography.

Authors:  Ali Baghani; Septimiu Salcudean; Robert Rohling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Calculation of shear stiffness in noise dominated magnetic resonance elastography data based on principal frequency estimation.

Authors:  K P McGee; D Lake; Y Mariappan; R D Hubmayr; A Manduca; K Ansell; R L Ehman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  In vivo imaging of rapid deformation and strain in an animal model of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Philip V Bayly; Erin E Black; Rachel C Pedersen; Elizabeth P Leister; Guy M Genin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Meng Yin; James F Glockner; Naoki Takahashi; Philip A Araoz; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Ingolf Sack; Bernd Beierbach; Uwe Hamhaber; Dieter Klatt; Jürgen Braun
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  2 in total

1.  Estimation of transversely isotropic material properties from magnetic resonance elastography using the optimised virtual fields method.

Authors:  Renee Miller; Arunark Kolipaka; Martyn P Nash; Alistair A Young
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 2.  Stiffness reconstruction methods for MR elastography.

Authors:  Daniel Fovargue; David Nordsletten; Ralph Sinkus
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.