Literature DB >> 23797239

Including spatial information in nonlinear inversion MR elastography using soft prior regularization.

Matthew McGarry, Curtis L Johnson, Bradley P Sutton, Elijah Ew Van Houten, John G Georgiadis, John B Weaver, Keith D Paulsen.   

Abstract

Tissue displacements required for mechanical property reconstruction in magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) are acquired in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, therefore, anatomical information is available from other imaging sequences. Despite its availability, few attempts to incorporate prior spatial information in the MRE reconstruction process have been reported. This paper implements and evaluates soft prior regularization (SPR), through which homogeneity in predefined spatial regions is enforced by a penalty term in a nonlinear inversion strategy. Phantom experiments and simulations show that when predefined regions are spatially accurate, recovered property values are stable for SPR weighting factors spanning several orders of magnitude, whereas inaccurate segmentation results in bias in the reconstructed properties that can be mitigated through proper choice of regularization weighting. The method was evaluated in vivo by estimating viscoelastic mechanical properties of frontal lobe gray and white matter for five repeated scans of a healthy volunteer. Segmentations of each tissue type were generated using automated software, and statistically significant differences between frontal lobe gray and white matter were found for both the storage modulus and loss modulus . Provided homogeneous property assumptions are reasonable, SPR produces accurate quantitative property estimates for tissue structures which are finer than the resolution currently achievable with fully distributed MRE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23797239      PMCID: PMC4107367          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2268978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  49 in total

1.  An overlapping subzone technique for MR-based elastic property reconstruction.

Authors:  E E Van Houten; K D Paulsen; M I Miga; F E Kennedy; J B Weaver
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Modeling shear modulus distribution in magnetic resonance elastography with piecewise constant level sets.

Authors:  Bing Nan Li; Chee Kong Chui; Sim Heng Ong; Tomokazu Numano; Toshikatsu Washio; Kazuhiro Homma; Stephen Chang; Sudhakar Venkatesh; Etsuko Kobayashi
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Combining near-infrared tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to study in vivo breast tissue: implementation of a Laplacian-type regularization to incorporate magnetic resonance structure.

Authors:  Ben Brooksby; Shudong Jiang; Hamid Dehghani; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; John Weaver; Christine Kogel; Steven P Poplack
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 5.  Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  Paul A Janmey; Christopher A McCulloch
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  Viscoelastic properties of the tongue and soft palate using MR elastography.

Authors:  S Cheng; S C Gandevia; M Green; R Sinkus; L E Bilston
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Christine Sempoux; Eric Vicaut; Najat Salameh; Laurence Annet; Etienne Danse; Frank Peeters; Leon C ter Beek; Jacques Rahier; Ralph Sinkus; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  An octahedral shear strain-based measure of SNR for 3D MR elastography.

Authors:  M D J McGarry; E E W Van Houten; P R Perriñez; A J Pattison; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Bone dielectric property variation as a function of mineralization at microwave frequencies.

Authors:  Paul M Meaney; Tian Zhou; Douglas Goodwin; Amir Golnabi; Elia A Attardo; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2012-04-19
View more
  36 in total

1.  Double dissociation of structure-function relationships in memory and fluid intelligence observed with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Kevin M Horecka; Matthew D J McGarry; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Assessing the accuracy and reproducibility of modality independent elastography in a murine model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Katelyn M Flint; Violeta Sanchez; Thomas E Yankeelov; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-07-02

3.  Suitability of poroelastic and viscoelastic mechanical models for high and low frequency MR elastography.

Authors:  M D J McGarry; C L Johnson; B P Sutton; J G Georgiadis; E E W Van Houten; A J Pattison; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  In vivo estimates of axonal stretch and 3D brain deformation during mild head impact.

Authors:  Andrew K Knutsen; Arnold D Gomez; Mihika Gangolli; Wen-Tung Wang; Deva Chan; Yuan-Chiao Lu; Eftychios Christoforou; Jerry L Prince; Philip V Bayly; John A Butman; Dzung L Pham
Journal:  Brain Multiphys       Date:  2020-09-03

5.  Contrast-Enhanced Quantitative Intravascular Elastography: The Impact of Microvasculature on Model-Based Elastography.

Authors:  Steven Huntzicker; Himanshu Shekhar; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Viscoelasticity of subcortical gray matter structures.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Matthew D J McGarry; Aaron T Anderson; Graham R Huesmann; Bradley P Sutton; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Gradient-Based Optimization for Poroelastic and Viscoelastic MR Elastography.

Authors:  Likun Tan; Matthew D J McGarry; Elijah E W Van Houten; Ming Ji; Ligin Solamen; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Viscoelasticity of reward and control systems in adolescent risk taking.

Authors:  Grace McIlvain; Rebecca G Clements; Emily M Magoon; Jeffrey M Spielberg; Eva H Telzer; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Spatially-resolved hydraulic conductivity estimation via poroelastic magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Adam J Pattison; Matthew McGarry; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 10.  Advances and Future Direction of Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  Huiming Dong; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.