Literature DB >> 21698518

The distinct role of comparative risk perceptions in a breast cancer prevention program.

Amanda J Dillard1, Peter A Ubel, Dylan M Smith, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Vijay Nair, Holly A Derry, Aijun Zhang, Rosemarie K Pitsch, Sharon Hensley Alford, Jennifer B McClure, Angela Fagerlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparative risk perceptions may rival other types of information in terms of effects on health behavior decisions.
PURPOSE: We examined associations between comparative risk perceptions, affect, and behavior while controlling for absolute risk perceptions and actual risk.
METHODS: Women at an increased risk of breast cancer participated in a program to learn about tamoxifen which can reduce the risk of breast cancer. They reported comparative risk perceptions of breast cancer and completed measures of anxiety, knowledge, and tamoxifen-related behavior intentions. Three months later, the women reported their behavior.
RESULTS: Comparative risk perceptions were positively correlated with anxiety, knowledge, intentions, and behavior 3 months later. After controlling for participants' actual risk of breast cancer and absolute risk perceptions, comparative risk perceptions predicted anxiety and knowledge, but not intentions or behavior.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparative risk perceptions can affect patient outcomes like anxiety and knowledge independently of absolute risk perceptions and actual risk information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21698518      PMCID: PMC3760792          DOI: 10.1007/s12160-011-9287-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  25 in total

1.  Risk communication and worry about breast cancer.

Authors:  Kd McCaul; Ab Canevello; Jl Mathwig; Wmp Klein
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Scott M Lippman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Risk perceptions and participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  S J Blalock; B M DeVellis; R A Afifi; R S Sandler
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Measuring perceptions of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Andrea Gurmankin Levy; Judy Shea; Sankey V Williams; Alex Quistberg; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Perceived and actual breast cancer risk: optimistic and pessimistic biases.

Authors:  C S Skinner; M W Kreuter; S Kobrin; V J Strecher
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  1998-04

6.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Naive beliefs about breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K D McCaul; S M O'Donnell
Journal:  Womens Health       Date:  1998

8.  Women's decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Vijayan Nair; Holly A Derry; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Azadeh Stark; Sharon Hensley Alford; Paula Lantz; Daniel F Hayes; Cheryl Wiese; Sarah Claud Zweig; Rosemarie Pitsch; Aleksandra Jankovic; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel; Dylan M Smith; Holly A Derry; Jennifer B McClure; Azadeh Stark; Rosemarie K Pitsch; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11

Review 10.  Cancer risk elicitation and communication: lessons from the psychology of risk perception.

Authors:  William M P Klein; Michael E Stefanek
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  7 in total

1.  Affective associations and cognitive beliefs relate to individuals' decisions to perform testicular or breast self-exams.

Authors:  Carolyn R Brown-Kramer; Marc T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-04-08

2.  Specifying Future Behavior When Assessing Risk Perceptions: Implications for Measurement and Theory.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Nicole Ackermann; Courtney S Wheeler
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Physical activity: the relative associations with cognitive and affective risk beliefs.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2019-04-23

4.  Combining risk communication strategies to simultaneously convey the risks of four diseases associated with physical inactivity to socio-demographically diverse populations.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Robert A C Ruiter; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-10-13

5.  What Factors Influence Women's Perceptions of their Systemic Recurrence Risk after Breast Cancer Treatment?

Authors:  Kamaria L Lee; Nancy K Janz; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Reshma Jagsi; Lauren P Wallner; Allison W Kurian; Steven J Katz; Paul Abrahamse; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.749

Review 6.  Motivators and barriers of tamoxifen use as risk-reducing medication amongst women at increased breast cancer risk: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  B Meiser; W K T Wong; M Peate; C Julian-Reynier; J Kirk; G Mitchell
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.857

7.  Communicating risk of medication side-effects: role of communication format on risk perception.

Authors:  Ruta Sawant; Sujit Sansgiry
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2018-06-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.