Literature DB >> 29027602

Combining risk communication strategies to simultaneously convey the risks of four diseases associated with physical inactivity to socio-demographically diverse populations.

Eva Janssen1, Robert A C Ruiter1, Erika A Waters2.   

Abstract

A single risk factor can increase the risk of developing multiple diseases, but most risk communication research has been conducted in the context of a single disease. We explored which combination of three recommended risk communication strategies is most effective in simultaneously conveying risk estimates of four diseases associated with physical inactivity: colon cancer, stroke, diabetes, and heart disease. Participants (N = 1161, 50% no college experience, 50% racial/ethnic minority) were shown hypothetical risk estimates for each of the four diseases. All four diseases were placed at varying heights on 1 of 12 vertical bar charts (i.e., "risk ladders") to indicate their respective probabilities. The risk ladders varied in a 2 (risk reduction information: present/absent) × 2 (numerical format: words/words and numbers) × 3 (social comparison information: none/somewhat higher than average/much higher than average) full factorial design. Participants were randomly assigned to view one of the risk ladders and then completed a questionnaire assessing message comprehension, message acceptance, physical activity-related risk and efficacy beliefs, and physical activity intentions. Higher message acceptance was found among (1) people who received risk reduction information versus those who did not (p = .01), and (2) people who did not receive social comparison information versus those told that they were at higher than average risk (p = .03). Further, absolute cognitive perceived risk of developing "any of the diseases shown in the picture" was higher among people who did not receive social comparison information (p = .03). No other main effects and only very few interactions with demographic variables were found. Combining recommended risk communication strategies did not improve or impair key cognitive or affective precursors of health behavior change. It might not be necessary to provide people with extensive information when communicating risk estimates of multiple diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Health disparities; Physical activity; Risk communication

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29027602      PMCID: PMC5899069          DOI: 10.1007/s10865-017-9894-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  50 in total

1.  Experimental evidence for stages of health behavior change: the precaution adoption process model applied to home radon testing.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; J E Lyon; P M Sandman; C L Cuite
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Mass media campaigns designed to support new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets: evidence of a complementary relationship.

Authors:  Emily Brennan; Sarah J Durkin; Trish Cotter; Todd Harper; Melanie A Wakefield
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Measuring risk perceptions of skin cancer: reliability and validity of different operationalizations.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Liesbeth van Osch; Hein de Vries; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2011-02

4.  The influence of narrative risk communication on feelings of cancer risk.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Liesbeth van Osch; Hein de Vries; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2012-10-01

5.  Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: the role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability.

Authors:  Paul D Windschitl; René Martin; Annette R Flugstad
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-05

6.  What do cancer survivors believe causes cancer? (United States).

Authors:  Kimberly S Wold; Tim Byers; Lori A Crane; Dennis Ahnen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Understanding narrative effects: the impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American women.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Matthew W Kreuter; Bindu Kalesan; Kassandra I Alcaraz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Women's decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Vijayan Nair; Holly A Derry; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Azadeh Stark; Sharon Hensley Alford; Paula Lantz; Daniel F Hayes; Cheryl Wiese; Sarah Claud Zweig; Rosemarie Pitsch; Aleksandra Jankovic; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  The impact of personal and social comparison information about health risk.

Authors:  David P French; Stephen R Sutton; Theresa M Marteau; Ann Louise Kinmonth
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2004-05

10.  The value of personalised risk information: a qualitative study of the perceptions of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Norbert Hootsmans; Michael Neilson; Bethany Roy; Terence Kungel; Caitlin Gutheil; Michael Diefenbach; Moritz Hansen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  10 in total

1.  Awareness of Health Outcomes Associated with Insufficient Physical Activity and Associations with Physical Activity Intentions and Behavior.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Emily Hawkins
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-08-09

2.  Using the Short Graph Literacy Scale to Predict Precursors of Health Behavior Change.

Authors:  Yasmina Okan; Eva Janssen; Mirta Galesic; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  What should governments be doing to prevent diabetes throughout the life course?

Authors:  Patrick Timpel; Lorenz Harst; Doreen Reifegerste; Susann Weihrauch-Blüher; Peter E H Schwarz
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Adapting a self-affirmation intervention for use in a mobile application for smokers.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Amy McQueen; Nicolle Simonovic; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-22

5.  Physical activity: the relative associations with cognitive and affective risk beliefs.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2019-04-23

6.  Dismissing "Don't Know" Responses to Perceived Risk Survey Items Threatens the Validity of Theoretical and Empirical Behavior-Change Research.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Marc T Kiviniemi; Jennifer L Hay; Heather Orom
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-11-23

7.  Don't know responses to cognitive and affective risk perception measures: Exploring prevalence and socio-demographic moderators.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Philippe Verduyn; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2018-02-02

8.  Adherence of Internet-Based Cancer Risk Assessment Tools to Best Practices in Risk Communication: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Jeremy L Foust; Laura D Scherer; Amy McQueen; Jennifer M Taber
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Rapid review of virus risk communication interventions: Directions for COVID-19.

Authors:  Darren M Winograd; Cara L Fresquez; Madison Egli; Emily K Peterson; Alyssa R Lombardi; Allison Megale; Yajaira A Cabrera Tineo; Michael G Verile; Alison L Phillips; Jessica Y Breland; Susan Santos; Lisa M McAndrew
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-01-20

10.  Factors influencing nursing students' participatory behaviour during COVID-19.

Authors:  Chung Hee Woo; Ju Young Park; Seun Young Joe
Journal:  Collegian       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 1.807

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.