Literature DB >> 21974728

Risk communication and worry about breast cancer.

Kd McCaul1, Ab Canevello, Jl Mathwig, Wmp Klein.   

Abstract

Feedback concerning breast cancer risk was provided to 59 college-aged women who were overestimating their personal risk. In a 2 (Absolute Risk Feedback; yes or no) × 2 (Comparative Risk Feedback; yes or no) design, women completed a brief risk questionnaire and then received both, one, or neither kind of risk feedback. Absolute information reduced estimates of vulnerability, although not to the levels suggested by the feedback. Absolute feedback had no effect on worry about breast cancer, but worry was lower for women who learned that they were no more at risk than other, similar women.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 21974728     DOI: 10.1080/13548500310001604513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health Med        ISSN: 1354-8506            Impact factor:   2.423


  8 in total

Review 1.  Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-23

2.  The distinct role of comparative risk perceptions in a breast cancer prevention program.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Peter A Ubel; Dylan M Smith; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Vijay Nair; Holly A Derry; Aijun Zhang; Rosemarie K Pitsch; Sharon Hensley Alford; Jennifer B McClure; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-10

3.  Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey.

Authors:  Sinan Alper; Fatih Bayrak; Onurcan Yilmaz
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2020-06-29

4.  Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; William M P Klein; Thomas C Lehman; Holly Massett; Simon C Lee; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Priority of Risk (But Not Perceived Magnitude of Risk) Predicts Improved Sun-Protection Behavior Following Genetic Counseling for Familial Melanoma.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall; Danielle M Drummond; Tammy K Stump; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-02-12

6.  Conceptual problems in laypersons' understanding of individualized cancer risk: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Thomas C Lehman; Holly Massett; Simon J C Lee; William M P Klein; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Effect of interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information on intentions and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Juliet A Usher-Smith; Barbora Silarova; Stephen J Sharp; Katie Mills; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max Bayne; Madi Fairey; Barbora Silarova; Simon J Griffin; Stephen J Sharp; William M P Klein; Stephen Sutton; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-08-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.